fmt

test/kafka/metadata_comparison_test.go

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ func TestMetadataResponseComparison(t *testing.T) {
 
 	host, port := gatewayServer.GetListenerAddr()
 	addr := fmt.Sprintf("%s:%d", host, port)
-	
+
 	// Add the same topic for both tests
 	topic := "comparison-topic"
 	gatewayServer.GetHandler().AddTopicForTesting(topic, 1)
@@ -30,17 +30,17 @@ func TestMetadataResponseComparison(t *testing.T) {
 	t.Logf("=== COMPARISON TEST ===")
 	t.Logf("Gateway: %s", addr)
 	t.Logf("Topic: %s", topic)
-	
+
 	// The key insight: Both Sarama and kafka-go should get the SAME metadata response
 	// But Sarama works and kafka-go doesn't - this suggests kafka-go has stricter validation
-	
+
 	// Let's examine what our current Metadata v4 response looks like
 	t.Logf("Run Sarama test and kafka-go test separately to compare logs")
 	t.Logf("Look for differences in:")
 	t.Logf("1. Response byte counts")
-	t.Logf("2. Broker ID consistency") 
+	t.Logf("2. Broker ID consistency")
 	t.Logf("3. Partition leader/ISR values")
 	t.Logf("4. Error codes")
-	
+
 	// This test is just for documentation - the real comparison happens in logs
 }

test/kafka/metadata_debug_test.go

@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ import (
 	"testing"
 	"time"
 
-	"github.com/segmentio/kafka-go"
 	"github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs/weed/mq/kafka/gateway"
+	"github.com/segmentio/kafka-go"
 )
 
 func TestMetadataV6Debug(t *testing.T) {
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ func TestMetadataV6Debug(t *testing.T) {
 
 	t.Logf("Successfully read %d partitions for topic %s", len(partitions), topic)
 	for _, p := range partitions {
-		t.Logf("Partition %d: Leader=%d, Replicas=%v, ISR=%v", 
+		t.Logf("Partition %d: Leader=%d, Replicas=%v, ISR=%v",
 			p.ID, p.Leader.ID, p.Replicas, p.Isr)
 	}
-}
+}