* ci: skip setup-go cache on self-hosted runners
The module cache is already local on a persistent self-hosted runner;
archiving ~/go/pkg/mod into cache.tzst at every job's end is pure cost
and can stall (a ~4-minute zstdmt hang was observed on awscli-tests).
runner.environment gates the cache to GitHub-hosted runners only.
Generated with [Devin](https://devin.ai)
Co-Authored-By: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* ci: gate the remaining setup-go caches too
The first pass only covered go-version-file steps; go-version steps in
nine workflows (including awscli-tests' own file) kept uploading the
cache archive on self-hosted runners.
Generated with [Devin](https://devin.ai)
Co-Authored-By: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* ci: cancel superseded workflow runs on PR pushes
PR-triggered workflows without a concurrency group keep running (and
holding runner slots) after a force-push or quick follow-up commit
supersedes them. Add the same group/cancel-in-progress block the go
workflow already uses, keyed on head_ref, to the remaining PR workflows.
Generated with [Devin](https://devin.ai)
Co-Authored-By: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* ci: key concurrency groups on PR number or ref, not head_ref
github.head_ref is empty on tag pushes and manual runs (every run then
shares one group and cancels the last) and collides across forks when
two PRs share a branch name. pull_request.number is unique per PR;
github.ref covers push/tag/dispatch. Applied to all workflows using the
pattern, including pre-existing ones.
Generated with [Devin](https://devin.ai)
Co-Authored-By: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* ci: restrict cancel-in-progress to PR and branch-push runs
* ci: serialize container_latest manual runs by destination tag
Two workflow_dispatch runs sharing an image_tag could otherwise build
concurrently: their per-arch images publish to the same platform tags,
so one run's create-manifest job can combine platforms from different
source refs. Group dispatch runs by the destination tag (with
cancel-in-progress already disabled for non-PR/non-branch events) so
same-tag publishes queue instead of interleaving.
* ci: serialize manual publish runs by destination tag in remaining container workflows
* ci: group foundationdb release dispatch runs by release tag
A manual run now shares the tag-push concurrency group for the same
release, so a re-publish of a tag queues behind (or ahead of) the push
run instead of racing it on the same image tag.
Generated with [Devin](https://devin.ai)
Co-Authored-By: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* ci: serialize foundationdb_version dispatch runs by destination tag
Two manual runs resolving to the same docker tag now share a concurrency
group (explicit image_tag, else the computed
foundationdb_<fdb>_seaweedfs_<ref> default), so they queue instead of
racing pushes to the same tag.
Generated with [Devin](https://devin.ai)
Co-Authored-By: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* ci: drop unsupported toLower() from foundationdb_version concurrency group
* ci: key rocksdb_version dispatch group on its published tag
* ci: queue publish runs via turnstyle instead of cancel-free shared groups
* Revert "ci: queue publish runs via turnstyle instead of cancel-free shared groups"
This reverts commit 039148f8d5.
* ci: queue same-tag publish runs instead of replacing the pending one
Dispatch/tag-only workflows can never cancel in progress, so opt their
concurrency groups into queue: max — up to 100 same-tag publishes wait
in line rather than each new dispatch cancelling the pending one.
---------
Co-authored-by: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix(master): let the growth initiator wait for the growth it triggered
The growth-in-flight shed also fired on the request that initiated the
growth: it sets the pending flag right before the shed check, so a
cold-start assign enqueued growth and immediately failed itself with
"volume growth in progress". With no concurrent assigns around to pick
up the freshly grown volume, a single writer against an empty cluster
never completes a write despite ample free space.
Claim the pending flag with a compare-and-swap so exactly one request
becomes the initiator, triggering growth at most once, and let it wait
for that growth to land. Everyone else still sheds retryably instead of
pinning a goroutine: followers behind an in-flight growth, an initiator
whose growth concluded without yielding a writable volume, and an
initiator whose growth outlives the 10s wait budget, which previously
surfaced a non-retryable error (gRPC Unknown, HTTP 406) even though a
retry would have succeeded moments later.
* fix(master): stop assign waits when the request is cancelled
The assign retry loops slept through client cancellation, keeping a
goroutine spinning for the rest of the 10s budget after the caller had
gone; StreamAssign also ran assigns on a background context detached
from the stream. Wait on the request context and pass the stream
context through.
* topology: drop the unconditional grow-request setter
Growth is only claimed through AddGrowRequestIfAbsent's compare-and-swap
now; keeping the raw Store(true) around invites the check-then-set race
back.
* test: cover cold-start first write with a real cluster
Boot a fresh master plus three empty volume servers and require the very
first assign - HTTP and gRPC, each on a cold volume layout, no client
retries - to complete a write. The assign that triggers volume growth
must wait for it rather than answering "volume growth in progress";
unit tests stub the topology, so only a real cluster exercises the
assign-grow-wait path end to end.
