2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Chris Lu	a2ff9cca27	master: let VolumeList ask for the volumes it wants (#10674) ... * master: let VolumeList ask for the volumes it wants The request carried nothing, so every caller was answered with the whole cluster. A dashboard opening one volume's page, or a capacity probe adding up one bucket, was served all 800k of them and threw away the rest -- and the master built every one of those messages first. The topology, its disks and their counters are still reported in full: a caller reading free space or replica placement needs the cluster whichever volumes it asked about. Only what is listed under a disk is selected, ec shards included. An empty collection and a zero volume id take everything, the way volume.list already reads its own -collectionPattern and -volumeId, so a caller that forgets to narrow is answered too much rather than answered wrongly. That leaves the default collection unnameable, since it is the one the empty string names, so it gets a field of its own. An older client sends none of it and is answered exactly as before. * admin: ask the master for the volume the page is showing A volume's detail page was pulling every volume in the cluster to find one and its replicas, and discarding the rest. * admin: ask the master for the ec volume the page is showing Same as the volume detail page: one volume's shards were found by pulling every ec shard in the cluster. * s3: ask the master for the bucket's own collection The SOSAPI capacity probe summed one collection's volumes out of a listing of every volume in the cluster. Cluster capacity still comes out the same: it is read from the disk counters, which a filtered listing reports in full. * topology: read the disk usage counters atomically They are written with atomic.AddInt64 from heartbeats but were read plainly by the two listings and by FreeSpace, and the map they sit in was iterated without the lock its neighbour takes. Under -race a listing concurrent with a heartbeat trips on both.	2026-08-09 21:59:42 -07:00
Chris Lu	f1f720f5da	fix(master): register EC shards per physical disk on full heartbeat sync (#9212) (#9219) ... * refactor(types): add DiskId type for physical-disk identifiers Names the uint32 physical-disk index that volume servers carry in VolumeEcShardInformationMessage / VolumeInformationMessage, so EC shard tracking that needs to distinguish disks within a DataNode can use a dedicated type instead of an untyped uint32. No behaviour change. * fix(master): register EC shards per physical disk on full heartbeat sync (#9212) When a volume's EC shards are spread across multiple physical disks on the same volume server (common after ec.balance / ec.rebuild on multi-disk nodes), the volume server emits one VolumeEcShardInformationMessage per (disk, volume) in its heartbeat. The master's DataNode.UpdateEcShards was building a `map[VolumeId]*EcVolumeInfo` with last-write-wins, and doUpdateEcShards then overwrote `disk.ecShards[vid]` once per message, so all but the final disk's shards were silently dropped. Only the topology-global ecShardMap (built via RegisterEcShards in a per-message loop) stayed correct, which hid the problem from `topo.LookupEcShards` but broke everything that reads the DataNode/Disk view — volume.list, admin UI, ec.rebuild dry-run ("only 6 shards, skipping"), and `DiskInfo.EcShardInfos` which the shell's ec.balance / ec.rebuild planners group by `eci.DiskId`. Change the shape of `Disk.ecShards` from map[VolumeId]*EcVolumeInfo to map[VolumeId]map[types.DiskId]*EcVolumeInfo so every physical disk keeps its own entry. UpdateEcShards aggregates incoming messages by (vid, diskId) rather than vid alone; Add/Delete/ HasVolumesById and HasEcShards consult the nested map; doUpdateEcShards rewrites the nested structure from the aggregated map. Per-physical-disk attribution survives through DataNode.ToDataNodeInfo -> DiskInfo.EcShardInfos, matching the wire format the volume server produces and what downstream admin tooling expects. Delta sync (AddOrUpdateEcShard / DeleteEcShard) already merged via ShardsInfo.Add, so this only affects the full-sync path that runs on heartbeat reconnect. Adds data_node_ec_multi_disk_test.go with two regression tests that fail on pre-fix master: - TestEcShardsAcrossMultipleDisksOnSameNode: volume 15 spread over 3 disks (matches the bug report's volume-2 row); asserts every shard visible via LookupEcShards, DataNode.GetEcShards, and ToDataNodeInfo's per-disk EcShardInfos entries. - TestEcShardsAfterRestartHeartbeat: minimal 2-disk full sync case. * fix(topology): tighten locking around EC shard map access Addresses review comments on #9219: * DataNode.UpdateEcShards now holds dn.Lock for the full read-diff-write cycle, matching UpdateVolumes' model, so concurrent heartbeats can no longer interleave their getOrCreateDisk / UpAdjustDiskUsageDelta updates with each other. Introduces a private getEcShardsLocked helper for reads under the held lock; renames doUpdateEcShards to doUpdateEcShardsLocked for the same reason. * DataNode.HasEcShards now takes each disk's ecShardsLock while reading disk.ecShards, closing a pre-existing map race with concurrent Add/Delete/Update writers. * doUpdateEcShardsLocked takes each disk's ecShardsLock around the reset-and-rewrite so readers (GetEcShards, HasEcShards) see a consistent map state rather than a partially-rebuilt one. * Disk.GetEcShards' slice-capacity hint now accounts for the nested per-physical-disk entries (sum of inner lengths) instead of underestimating by the unique-volume count.	2026-04-24 14:01:09 -07:00