Commit Graph
7 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Chris Lu f1f720f5da fix(master): register EC shards per physical disk on full heartbeat sync (#9212) (#9219)
* refactor(types): add DiskId type for physical-disk identifiers

Names the uint32 physical-disk index that volume servers carry in
VolumeEcShardInformationMessage / VolumeInformationMessage, so EC shard
tracking that needs to distinguish disks within a DataNode can use a
dedicated type instead of an untyped uint32. No behaviour change.

* fix(master): register EC shards per physical disk on full heartbeat sync (#9212)

When a volume's EC shards are spread across multiple physical disks on the
same volume server (common after ec.balance / ec.rebuild on multi-disk
nodes), the volume server emits one VolumeEcShardInformationMessage per
(disk, volume) in its heartbeat. The master's DataNode.UpdateEcShards was
building a `map[VolumeId]*EcVolumeInfo` with last-write-wins, and
doUpdateEcShards then overwrote `disk.ecShards[vid]` once per message, so
all but the final disk's shards were silently dropped. Only the
topology-global ecShardMap (built via RegisterEcShards in a per-message
loop) stayed correct, which hid the problem from `topo.LookupEcShards`
but broke everything that reads the DataNode/Disk view — volume.list,
admin UI, ec.rebuild dry-run ("only 6 shards, skipping"), and
`DiskInfo.EcShardInfos` which the shell's ec.balance / ec.rebuild
planners group by `eci.DiskId`.

Change the shape of `Disk.ecShards` from
    map[VolumeId]*EcVolumeInfo
to
    map[VolumeId]map[types.DiskId]*EcVolumeInfo

so every physical disk keeps its own entry. UpdateEcShards aggregates
incoming messages by (vid, diskId) rather than vid alone; Add/Delete/
HasVolumesById and HasEcShards consult the nested map; doUpdateEcShards
rewrites the nested structure from the aggregated map. Per-physical-disk
attribution survives through DataNode.ToDataNodeInfo ->
DiskInfo.EcShardInfos, matching the wire format the volume server
produces and what downstream admin tooling expects.

Delta sync (AddOrUpdateEcShard / DeleteEcShard) already merged via
ShardsInfo.Add, so this only affects the full-sync path that runs on
heartbeat reconnect.

Adds data_node_ec_multi_disk_test.go with two regression tests that fail
on pre-fix master:
- TestEcShardsAcrossMultipleDisksOnSameNode: volume 15 spread over 3
  disks (matches the bug report's volume-2 row); asserts every shard
  visible via LookupEcShards, DataNode.GetEcShards, and ToDataNodeInfo's
  per-disk EcShardInfos entries.
- TestEcShardsAfterRestartHeartbeat: minimal 2-disk full sync case.

* fix(topology): tighten locking around EC shard map access

Addresses review comments on #9219:

* DataNode.UpdateEcShards now holds dn.Lock for the full read-diff-write
  cycle, matching UpdateVolumes' model, so concurrent heartbeats can no
  longer interleave their getOrCreateDisk / UpAdjustDiskUsageDelta
  updates with each other. Introduces a private getEcShardsLocked helper
  for reads under the held lock; renames doUpdateEcShards to
  doUpdateEcShardsLocked for the same reason.

* DataNode.HasEcShards now takes each disk's ecShardsLock while reading
  disk.ecShards, closing a pre-existing map race with concurrent
  Add/Delete/Update writers.

* doUpdateEcShardsLocked takes each disk's ecShardsLock around the
  reset-and-rewrite so readers (GetEcShards, HasEcShards) see a
  consistent map state rather than a partially-rebuilt one.

* Disk.GetEcShards' slice-capacity hint now accounts for the nested
  per-physical-disk entries (sum of inner lengths) instead of
  underestimating by the unique-volume count.
2026-04-24 14:01:09 -07:00
Chris Lu 82d9d8687b Fix concurrent map access in EC shards info (#8222)
* fix concurrent map access in EC shards info #8219

* refactor: simplify Disk.ToDiskInfo to use ecShards snapshot and avoid redundant locking

* refactor: improve GetEcShards with pre-allocation and defer
2026-02-05 10:24:18 -08:00
Lisandro Pin 6b98b52acc Fix reporting of EC shard sizes from nodes to masters. (#7835)
SeaweedFS tracks EC shard sizes on topology data stuctures, but this information is never
relayed to master servers :( The end result is that commands reporting disk usage, such
as `volume.list` and `cluster.status`, yield incorrect figures when EC shards are present.

As an example for a simple 5-node test cluster, before...

```
> volume.list
Topology volumeSizeLimit:30000 MB hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9001 hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:3  size:88967096  file_count:172  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349617
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[1 5]
        Disk hdd total size:88967096 file_count:172
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9001 total size:88967096 file_count:172
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9002 hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:2  size:77267536  file_count:166  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349617
          volume id:3  size:88967096  file_count:172  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349617
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[0 4]
        Disk hdd total size:166234632 file_count:338
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9002 total size:166234632 file_count:338
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9003 hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:2  size:77267536  file_count:166  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349617
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[2 6]
        Disk hdd total size:77267536 file_count:166
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9003 total size:77267536 file_count:166
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9004 hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:2  size:77267536  file_count:166  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349617
          volume id:3  size:88967096  file_count:172  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349617
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[3 7]
        Disk hdd total size:166234632 file_count:338
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9004 total size:166234632 file_count:338
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9005 hdd(volume:0/8 active:0 free:8 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:0/8 active:0 free:8 remote:0) id:0
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[8 9 10 11 12 13]
        Disk hdd total size:0 file_count:0
    Rack DefaultRack total size:498703896 file_count:1014
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter total size:498703896 file_count:1014
total size:498703896 file_count:1014
```

...and after:

```
> volume.list
Topology volumeSizeLimit:30000 MB hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9001 hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:2  size:81761800  file_count:161  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349495
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[1 5 9] sizes:[1:8.00 MiB 5:8.00 MiB 9:8.00 MiB] total:24.00 MiB
        Disk hdd total size:81761800 file_count:161
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9001 total size:81761800 file_count:161
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9002 hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:3  size:88678712  file_count:170  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349495
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[11 12 13] sizes:[11:8.00 MiB 12:8.00 MiB 13:8.00 MiB] total:24.00 MiB
        Disk hdd total size:88678712 file_count:170
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9002 total size:88678712 file_count:170
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9003 hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:2  size:81761800  file_count:161  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349495
          volume id:3  size:88678712  file_count:170  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349495
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[0 4 8] sizes:[0:8.00 MiB 4:8.00 MiB 8:8.00 MiB] total:24.00 MiB
        Disk hdd total size:170440512 file_count:331
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9003 total size:170440512 file_count:331
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9004 hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:2  size:81761800  file_count:161  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349495
          volume id:3  size:88678712  file_count:170  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349495
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[2 6 10] sizes:[2:8.00 MiB 6:8.00 MiB 10:8.00 MiB] total:24.00 MiB
        Disk hdd total size:170440512 file_count:331
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9004 total size:170440512 file_count:331
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9005 hdd(volume:0/8 active:0 free:8 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:0/8 active:0 free:8 remote:0) id:0
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[3 7] sizes:[3:8.00 MiB 7:8.00 MiB] total:16.00 MiB
        Disk hdd total size:0 file_count:0
    Rack DefaultRack total size:511321536 file_count:993
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter total size:511321536 file_count:993
total size:511321536 file_count:993
```
2025-12-28 19:30:42 -08:00
chrislu 35fd1e1c9a optimize memory usage for large number of volumes
1. unwrap the map to avoid extra map object creation
2. fix ec shard counting in UpdateEcShards
2024-10-10 10:00:30 -07:00
chrislu 26dbc6c905 move to https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs 2022-07-29 00:17:28 -07:00
Chris Lu 3fe628f04e use hdd instead of empty string 2021-02-16 03:03:00 -08:00
Chris Lu f8446b42ab this can compile now!!! 2021-02-16 02:47:02 -08:00