Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Chris LuandDevin 2d06e2d6c1 s3: evaluate tag conditions on copy-source and tagging subresources (#11771)
* s3: evaluate tag conditions on copy-source and tagging subresources

Policy evaluation ran without the object entry on several paths, so a
Deny conditioned on s3:ExistingObjectTag never matched:

- CopyObject, UploadPartCopy and RenameObject checked the source key
  before its entry was fetched; repeat the check on a synthesized GET
  once the entry resolves.
- GetObjectAttributes and Get/Put/DeleteObjectTagging never supplied
  the entry; recheck with the resolved entry.

Generated with [Devin](https://devin.ai)

Co-Authored-By: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* s3: fail closed on tag-policy lookups and honor tag-conditioned grants

- recheckTagConditionedPolicyWithLookup returned success when the entry
  lookup errored, letting a tag-gated Deny slip past a transient miss;
  only ErrNotFound still falls through to the handler's own NoSuchKey.
- A read or delete denied in the tagless first phase now gets one more
  evaluation with the resolved entry's tags in hand, so an
  s3:ExistingObjectTag-conditioned Allow can still grant a copy-source
  read or rename. The deferred recheck requires an explicit Allow;
  indeterminate results keep the original verdict, and the existence of
  the key never leaks past a deny.
- RenameObject now applies the same tag-aware recheck to the source
  removal, so a tag-gated Deny on s3:DeleteObject blocks a rename the
  way it blocks a direct DELETE.
- GetObjectAttributes evaluates the object-entry policy recheck before
  conditional headers, so a 304/412 response can no longer bypass a
  tag-based Deny.

* s3: honor identity denies in the tag-aware source recheck

The deferred recheck re-evaluates only the bucket policy, so a bucket
Allow could lift an explicit Deny in the caller's attached or session
policies on a copy/rename source. Apply the same applicable-policy Deny
check the first phase uses.

Generated with [Devin](https://devin.ai)

Co-Authored-By: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-16 19:50:36 -07:00
f99c4a1f14 s3: make RenameObject idempotent for a retried request (#11178)
* feat(s3): make RenameObject idempotent for a retried request - #10661

A rename that succeeds but whose response is lost leaves the client with
no safe move: retrying returned 404, because the source is already gone,
so a retry was indistinguishable from a rename that never happened.

The destination now carries what the rename that created it was, under
x-seaweedfs-rename-token: the client's token, the source key and the
time. A retry that names the same token and the same source and
destination is answered 200 without touching anything. The same token
sent for a different rename is refused with 409 rather than silently
answered, and a token older than 24 hours is treated as unrelated so a
key cannot answer for a request indefinitely.

Requests without the header behave exactly as before.

* s3: answer a reused rename token with 409, not 400

The PR promised Conflict and the code returned Bad Request. 400 tells a
client its request was malformed and invites it to give up; this request
is well formed and resending it unchanged will not help, because what it
collides with is a rename the same token already stands for.

The status code is now asserted in a test, since it is the part of this
behaviour a client actually acts on.

* Update weed/s3api/s3err/s3api_errors.go

Co-authored-by: devin-ai-integration[bot] <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* s3: fix rename token review notes

- ErrIdempotentParameterMismatch returns 409 Conflict, not 400. The
  comment and TestRenameTokenReuseAnswersConflict both expect 409; the
  code regressed to 400 in a later commit.
- stampRenameToken: clarify that markRenameToken mutates srcEntry in
  place, so the token reaches the destination via the move regardless
  of whether the UpdateEntry succeeds. The precondition only guards the
  pre-move write, not the move itself.
- Extract the handler retry branch into retryRenameDecision and add
  TestRetryRenameDecision, covering the source-still-exists fallthrough
  that was previously reasoned about but not tested.

* s3: IdempotentParameterMismatch returns 400, matching AWS docs

The AWS S3 RenameObject API documentation specifies HTTP Status Code: 400
for IdempotencyParameterMismatch. Revert the previous 409 change and align
the comment and test with the documented behavior.

---------

Co-authored-by: Chris Lu <chrislusf@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: devin-ai-integration[bot] <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris Lu <chris.lu@gmail.com>
2026-09-05 11:48:42 -07:00
Chris Lu 7bb0a1c127 s3: replay a delete whose reply the transport dropped (#11022)
* s3: stop retrying a delete the filer refused for a non-empty folder

The filer looked and the children are there, so the answer will not change.
retryFilerOp spent six attempts and up to 3.1s of backoff on it before the
caller could act on the condition it was already holding.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XqaJrwgXQ5GSUpyzRbe5nD

* s3: thread the request context through the unversioned delete path

doDeleteEntry issued every DeleteEntry on context.Background(), so an S3
client that hung up left the gateway working on its behalf, out of reach of
both cancellation and the per-request retry allowance that
DeleteMultipleObjectsHandler installs.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XqaJrwgXQ5GSUpyzRbe5nD

* s3: treat a cancelled filer RPC as terminal, not transient

isRetryableFilerErr matched context.Canceled and DeadlineExceeded by
sentinel, which only holds while the error is still local. Once it has
crossed gRPC it is a status, so an abandoned request was retried six times
on behalf of a caller that had already gone.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XqaJrwgXQ5GSUpyzRbe5nD

* s3: replay a delete whose reply the transport dropped

A delete is idempotent at the filer, which answers an entry that is already
gone with an empty resp.Error, so a reply lost in transit can be reissued
rather than surfaced. Surfaced, it becomes a 500 on the bucket delete, which
boto3 resends and is then answered NoSuchBucket, or a per-key InternalError
inside the 200 of a multi-object delete, which no SDK retries at all.

The replay runs through retryFilerOp, so it draws on the allowance the
request already installs rather than paying a backoff per key, and stops for
a caller that has gone. rm and rmObject re-enter WithFilerClient per attempt,
so each one walks the failover list again on a connection the failed attempt
had invalidated; the multi-object loop holds one client for the batch, so
there the replay reuses it.

Classification stays structural. The filer reports its own refusals in
resp.Error, which carries no status and has the deleted path - and, for a
recursive delete, the children it stopped on - formatted into it, so no key
name can steer the decision either way.

rm and rmObject now take the caller's context. Cleanup and rollback paths
pass context.Background() deliberately: they have to run whether or not the
caller is still waiting.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XqaJrwgXQ5GSUpyzRbe5nD

* s3: share one retry allowance across multipart completion cleanup

The unused-entry loop deletes once per entry, and each delete now retries,
so a filer that stays unavailable held the response for 3.1s per entry after
the object was already committed.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XqaJrwgXQ5GSUpyzRbe5nD
2026-08-28 14:30:21 -07:00
Chris Lu 863fec6c3f S3: let a key that is a prefix of other keys be an object (#10912)
* filer: keep the sentinel when CreateEntry reports an update failure

CreateEntry flattened the error UpdateEntry wraps, so errors.Is stopped
matching and ErrExistingIsDirectory and ErrExistingIsFile never reached
the S3 mapper, which answered a retryable 500 instead.

* s3: let a key that is a prefix of other keys be an object

S3 keys are flat, so "a/b" and "a/b/c" are independent objects that
coexist in either write order. The filer stores a key as a path, so one
of them has to live on the directory the other is nested under.

Writing the nested key first refused the prefix key outright. Writing it
second promoted the file to a directory, which kept its data but lost the
key: an empty object left nothing to recognise it by and disappeared, and
one with data listed under a trailing slash it never had.

Mark the directory that carries such a key, and write the object onto it
when the path is already a directory. The mark makes an empty prefix
object visible to listings and readable by GET and HEAD, keeps the empty
folder cleaner off it, and lists it under the key it was written with.
Deleting the key strips the mark back off along with the data.

* filer: keep a TTL off a directory that stands for an object

An expired entry is deleted a row at a time, so expiring a directory
removes it and leaves everything under it unreachable. Promoting a file
to a directory carried its TTL across, and a promoted file is exactly the
one that has keys nested under it.

Drop the TTL on promotion, and leave one an older build wrote alone. The
lifecycle worker still expires the object, through the delete that leaves
the directory behind.

* s3: delete the null version of a key other keys are nested under

The routed delete cannot remove an entry that other keys live under, and
answered a retryable 500 rather than falling back to the lock path the
unversioned delete already falls back to. That path then looked the entry
up under the bucket with the whole key as its name, so the demote wrote it
back one directory too high and failed as not found.

Fall back on any non-precondition error, and split the key before deleting
it. Trailing-slash directory markers with children reach the same delete.

* filer: keep the sentinel when MkFile and Mkdir report a create failure

Same flattening one layer out: every mkFile caller lost the sentinel, so
a CopyObject onto a key that other keys are nested under answered a
retryable 500 where a PutObject of the same key answers 409.

* s3: copy and rename a key that other keys are nested under

Such a key is stored on the directory those keys live in, and copy and
rename both refused it: the source lookup maps every directory entry to
NoSuchKey, so a key a plain GET serves could not be copied or moved, and
the destination side refused it as a directory conflict.

The source is read through a view of the entry as the object it names.
The destination is written the way a PutObject of that key writes it. A
rename at either end copies the object's own data across and strips it off
the source key rather than going through AtomicRenameEntry, which moves a
directory by moving everything under it - the nested keys are not part of
what is being renamed.
2026-08-24 15:10:34 -07:00
Chris Lu 2d9ea0285c s3: add the RenameObject endpoint (#10659)
* s3: add the RenameObject endpoint

PUT /{bucket}/{key}?renameObject with x-amz-rename-source moves an object
through the filer's AtomicRenameEntry, so no bytes are read or rewritten and
the ETag, tags and SSE keys travel with the entry.

Only unversioned buckets: a versioned rename would have to rebuild the
.versions chain, and AWS offers RenameObject on directory buckets, which
cannot be versioned. The source arrives in a header, so it is authorized
separately for read and delete; both keys are locked, in key order, across the
precondition checks and the move.

* s3: let a matched source ETag precondition settle its date precondition

RFC 7232 has an ETag precondition outrank the date precondition on its own
side, and AWS documents the same for CopyObject: a matching
x-amz-copy-source-if-match with a failing x-amz-copy-source-if-unmodified-since
copies rather than returning 412. The source check evaluated all four headers in
sequence, so the date header could still veto a decided ETag match.

validateConditionalHeadersForReads already applies this precedence; the source
path now matches it.

* s3: cover a rename source named as a directory without a trailing slash

Renaming a directory would move a whole subtree, so it has to stay a missing
key whether or not the caller wrote the trailing slash.

* s3: accept a bare object key as the RenameObject source

AWS spells x-amz-rename-source both ways. Its CLI, Java and Rust examples pass
the bare source key, and only a second CLI example and the boto3 conditional
example pass bucket/key; the API reference's own example is a bare key too. The
header was read as bucket/key only, so the form AWS leads with was rejected with
InvalidArgument and the endpoint was unusable as documented.

A value is now read as a literal key first — the only reading that can never
name the wrong object — and as bucket-qualified second, when it carries the
request's own bucket and the literal key does not exist. That costs one extra
lookup only for a source that starts with the bucket's own name.

Another bucket's name in the source is no longer a distinct error: RenameObject
moves within one bucket, so it is simply part of a key this bucket does not
hold, and it reports NoSuchKey.

* s3: only a proven absence picks the other reading of a rename source

A source that resolves to a directory is not a miss to fall through on: the
literal path is still what the caller named, so answering for it beats renaming
a different object under the bucket-qualified reading. With a directory at
bucket/source.txt and an object at source.txt, a rename naming the former moved
the latter.

A failed lookup is not a proof of absence either, so a blip can no longer
redirect a rename to the other reading.
2026-08-08 21:24:30 -07:00