Commit Graph
20 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Chris LuandDevin 2c510cc30e ec.rebuild: remount shards the rebuild replaced, keep regenerated copies (#12193)
* volume: remount ec shards the rebuild replaced under a mounted handle

Generated with [Devin](https://devin.ai)

Co-Authored-By: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* ec.rebuild: keep copied shards the rebuild regenerated in place

Generated with [Devin](https://devin.ai)

Co-Authored-By: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* volume: reopen regenerated ec shards in place instead of remounting

UnmountEcShards and MountEcShards send deltas through separate buffered
channels, so a remount can reach the master as add-then-delete and drop
the repaired shard from lookups until the next full EC heartbeat.
ReopenEcShard swaps the mounted shard's descriptor under the volume lock
instead: registration, disk type, and heartbeat state never flip, and
readers holding the old shard degrade to a clean error the parity path
already recovers from.

Generated with [Devin](https://devin.ai)

Co-Authored-By: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* rust volume: reopen rebuilt ec shards in place, mirroring Go

volume_ec_shards_rebuild recreates a shard file under a mounted handle
whose descriptor still serves the detached inode (a mounted shard whose
file was deleted under it). DiskLocation::reopen_ec_shard swaps the
mounted descriptor for a fresh open, matching Go's ReopenEcShard — the
registration and heartbeat view never flip.

Generated with [Devin](https://devin.ai)

Co-Authored-By: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* volume: fail ec rebuild when a regenerated shard cannot be reopened

* rust volume: fail ec shards rebuild when a rebuilt shard cannot be reopened

* volume: repoint mounted ec shards after rebuild across disks

A mounted shard whose file was deleted under the mount is "missing" to
the rebuild: the regenerated file lands on the rebuild location while
the handle keeps serving the detached inode on another disk. Reopening
the mounted disk then failed the whole RPC, so the caller never saw the
rebuilt ids and its deferred cleanup deleted the regenerated copies.

Repoint every mounted handle of the rebuilt volume instead of only this
run's outputs: reopen in place when the rebuilt file is on the mounted
disk, otherwise drop the stale handle and remount the shard from
whichever local disk holds the file via a delta-free load split out of
MountEcShards — a same-server move, so the master's registration never
flips. A shard that can be neither reopened nor remounted is left
unmounted rather than serving replaced bytes, and the repoint step no
longer fails the RPC, so RebuiltShardIds always reaches the caller.

Generated with [Devin](https://devin.ai)

Co-Authored-By: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* rust volume: repoint mounted ec shards after rebuild across disks

Mirror the Go repoint loop: iterate every mounted shard of the rebuilt
volume, reopen in place when the rebuilt file is on the mounted disk,
and otherwise drop the stale handle and remount the shard from
whichever local disk holds it. The repoint no longer fails the RPC, so
rebuilt_shard_ids still reaches the caller and its copy cleanup keeps
the regenerated shards.

Generated with [Devin](https://devin.ai)

Co-Authored-By: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* rust volume: still rebuild ecx and repoint mounts when no shard is missing

* master: keep a node in an ec shard's lookup while a disk still holds it

A rebuild that relocates a mounted shard between a node's disks reports
the move as a delete on the source disk plus an add on the destination.
Registering first is a no-op because shard lookups key on the node, then
the unregister dropped the node outright — and steady-state heartbeats
never restore it, so readers and later rebuilds lose the repaired copy.
Skip the delete while another disk on the node still holds the shard.

UnregisterDataNode now clears the node's own ec records before dropping
its registrations, so the retained-shard check cannot skip the teardown,
and each unregister gets a ShardsInfo copy since DeleteEcShard drains
the shared one.

* rust volume: fold the journal on a mounted index instead of rewriting it

The rebuild handler regenerated .ecx through File::create even while the
volume was mounted, truncating the index under readers that search the
open descriptor with its old size — a live lookup could hit EOF mid-scan.
Go folds the deletion journal in place on a mounted volume; do the same
through rebuild_ecx_from_journal and reserve the full regen for the
unmounted path, where nothing holds the file open to interrupt.

* volume, rust volume: report rebuilt shards on late failures, fix rust corrupt discovery

Two review findings the repoint rework left open:

- A RebuildEcxFile failure still returns a plain error after shards were
  regenerated, so the caller discards the response holding the rebuilt
  ids and the deferred cleanup deletes copies the rebuild regenerated
  in place. The Go handler now packs the ids into the gRPC status
  details and the shell pulls them back out on error; the Rust handler
  carries them in grpc-status-details-bin the same way.
- The Rust rebuild still counted a sidecar-corrupt shard as present, so
  it fed bad bytes into reconstruction and never regenerated the shard.
  Discovery now loads the generation-0 .ecsum the way Go does, verifies
  every present shard, and reclassifies mismatches (and zero-size
  residue) as rebuild targets written to a .rebuilding temp file,
  verified, and atomically renamed over the original only after every
  output passes the sidecar check. Honors unsafe_ignore_sidecar, added
  to VolumeEcShardsRebuildRequest to match the Go proto.

* volume: repoint sibling journals sharing a folded .ecj after rebuild

RebuildEcxFile unlinks the deletion journal and the mounted path only
reopens its own handle — a sibling mount journaling into the same file
keeps appending to the detached inode, and those deletes never reach a
path-based reader again. Reopen every mounted volume sharing the index
base before leaving the rebuild.

* rust volume: repoint sibling journals sharing a folded .ecj after rebuild

rebuild_ecx_from_journal replaces the journal and reopens only its own
handle; mounts on sibling disks sharing that .ecj keep the detached
handle, so their next appends are lost at restart. Adopt the folded
journal on every mounted runtime sharing the path before releasing the
store lock, clearing their in-memory set — every journaled id is now an
.ecx tombstone.

* ec: swap the deletion journal handle only after the new file opens

A failed reopen left ecjFile nil, so every later delete returned
"ec volume closed". Open first, then close and swap — mirroring the
Rust adopt_folded_journal ordering.

Generated with [Devin](https://devin.ai)

Co-Authored-By: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* ec.rebuild: fail the rebuild when a sibling journal cannot be repointed

A warning left the sibling mount journaling to a detached inode while
the RPC reported success. Propagate the error like the Rust handler's
adopt_folded_journal map_err.

Generated with [Devin](https://devin.ai)

Co-Authored-By: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* ec: keep deletes loud when the journal reopen cannot open the replacement

Reverts the swap-on-success ordering: a detached handle kept on failure
lets deletes append and sync to the removed inode, then vanish at
restart. Closing first also frees the descriptor before the open.

Generated with [Devin](https://devin.ai)

Co-Authored-By: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* rust volume: drop the folded journal handle before reopening it

adopt_folded_journal and the post-fold recreate now clear ecj_file
before opening the replacement, so a failed reopen leaves deletes
erroring instead of appending to the detached inode. Mirrors Go's
ReopenDeletionJournal.

Generated with [Devin](https://devin.ai)

Co-Authored-By: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* ec: drop the cached journal size when its reopen fails

Generated with [Devin](https://devin.ai)

Co-Authored-By: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-29 00:58:30 -07:00
Chris Lu f1f720f5da fix(master): register EC shards per physical disk on full heartbeat sync (#9212) (#9219)
* refactor(types): add DiskId type for physical-disk identifiers

Names the uint32 physical-disk index that volume servers carry in
VolumeEcShardInformationMessage / VolumeInformationMessage, so EC shard
tracking that needs to distinguish disks within a DataNode can use a
dedicated type instead of an untyped uint32. No behaviour change.

* fix(master): register EC shards per physical disk on full heartbeat sync (#9212)

When a volume's EC shards are spread across multiple physical disks on the
same volume server (common after ec.balance / ec.rebuild on multi-disk
nodes), the volume server emits one VolumeEcShardInformationMessage per
(disk, volume) in its heartbeat. The master's DataNode.UpdateEcShards was
building a `map[VolumeId]*EcVolumeInfo` with last-write-wins, and
doUpdateEcShards then overwrote `disk.ecShards[vid]` once per message, so
all but the final disk's shards were silently dropped. Only the
topology-global ecShardMap (built via RegisterEcShards in a per-message
loop) stayed correct, which hid the problem from `topo.LookupEcShards`
but broke everything that reads the DataNode/Disk view — volume.list,
admin UI, ec.rebuild dry-run ("only 6 shards, skipping"), and
`DiskInfo.EcShardInfos` which the shell's ec.balance / ec.rebuild
planners group by `eci.DiskId`.

Change the shape of `Disk.ecShards` from
    map[VolumeId]*EcVolumeInfo
to
    map[VolumeId]map[types.DiskId]*EcVolumeInfo

so every physical disk keeps its own entry. UpdateEcShards aggregates
incoming messages by (vid, diskId) rather than vid alone; Add/Delete/
HasVolumesById and HasEcShards consult the nested map; doUpdateEcShards
rewrites the nested structure from the aggregated map. Per-physical-disk
attribution survives through DataNode.ToDataNodeInfo ->
DiskInfo.EcShardInfos, matching the wire format the volume server
produces and what downstream admin tooling expects.

Delta sync (AddOrUpdateEcShard / DeleteEcShard) already merged via
ShardsInfo.Add, so this only affects the full-sync path that runs on
heartbeat reconnect.

Adds data_node_ec_multi_disk_test.go with two regression tests that fail
on pre-fix master:
- TestEcShardsAcrossMultipleDisksOnSameNode: volume 15 spread over 3
  disks (matches the bug report's volume-2 row); asserts every shard
  visible via LookupEcShards, DataNode.GetEcShards, and ToDataNodeInfo's
  per-disk EcShardInfos entries.
- TestEcShardsAfterRestartHeartbeat: minimal 2-disk full sync case.

* fix(topology): tighten locking around EC shard map access

Addresses review comments on #9219:

* DataNode.UpdateEcShards now holds dn.Lock for the full read-diff-write
  cycle, matching UpdateVolumes' model, so concurrent heartbeats can no
  longer interleave their getOrCreateDisk / UpAdjustDiskUsageDelta
  updates with each other. Introduces a private getEcShardsLocked helper
  for reads under the held lock; renames doUpdateEcShards to
  doUpdateEcShardsLocked for the same reason.

* DataNode.HasEcShards now takes each disk's ecShardsLock while reading
  disk.ecShards, closing a pre-existing map race with concurrent
  Add/Delete/Update writers.

* doUpdateEcShardsLocked takes each disk's ecShardsLock around the
  reset-and-rewrite so readers (GetEcShards, HasEcShards) see a
  consistent map state rather than a partially-rebuilt one.

* Disk.GetEcShards' slice-capacity hint now accounts for the nested
  per-physical-disk entries (sum of inner lengths) instead of
  underestimating by the unique-volume count.
2026-04-24 14:01:09 -07:00
Lisandro Pin 6b98b52acc Fix reporting of EC shard sizes from nodes to masters. (#7835)
SeaweedFS tracks EC shard sizes on topology data stuctures, but this information is never
relayed to master servers :( The end result is that commands reporting disk usage, such
as `volume.list` and `cluster.status`, yield incorrect figures when EC shards are present.

As an example for a simple 5-node test cluster, before...

```
> volume.list
Topology volumeSizeLimit:30000 MB hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9001 hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:3  size:88967096  file_count:172  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349617
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[1 5]
        Disk hdd total size:88967096 file_count:172
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9001 total size:88967096 file_count:172
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9002 hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:2  size:77267536  file_count:166  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349617
          volume id:3  size:88967096  file_count:172  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349617
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[0 4]
        Disk hdd total size:166234632 file_count:338
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9002 total size:166234632 file_count:338
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9003 hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:2  size:77267536  file_count:166  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349617
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[2 6]
        Disk hdd total size:77267536 file_count:166
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9003 total size:77267536 file_count:166
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9004 hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:2  size:77267536  file_count:166  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349617
          volume id:3  size:88967096  file_count:172  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349617
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[3 7]
        Disk hdd total size:166234632 file_count:338
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9004 total size:166234632 file_count:338
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9005 hdd(volume:0/8 active:0 free:8 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:0/8 active:0 free:8 remote:0) id:0
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[8 9 10 11 12 13]
        Disk hdd total size:0 file_count:0
    Rack DefaultRack total size:498703896 file_count:1014
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter total size:498703896 file_count:1014
total size:498703896 file_count:1014
```

...and after:

```
> volume.list
Topology volumeSizeLimit:30000 MB hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9001 hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:2  size:81761800  file_count:161  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349495
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[1 5 9] sizes:[1:8.00 MiB 5:8.00 MiB 9:8.00 MiB] total:24.00 MiB
        Disk hdd total size:81761800 file_count:161
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9001 total size:81761800 file_count:161
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9002 hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:3  size:88678712  file_count:170  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349495
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[11 12 13] sizes:[11:8.00 MiB 12:8.00 MiB 13:8.00 MiB] total:24.00 MiB
        Disk hdd total size:88678712 file_count:170
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9002 total size:88678712 file_count:170
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9003 hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:2  size:81761800  file_count:161  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349495
          volume id:3  size:88678712  file_count:170  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349495
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[0 4 8] sizes:[0:8.00 MiB 4:8.00 MiB 8:8.00 MiB] total:24.00 MiB
        Disk hdd total size:170440512 file_count:331
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9003 total size:170440512 file_count:331
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9004 hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:2  size:81761800  file_count:161  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349495
          volume id:3  size:88678712  file_count:170  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349495
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[2 6 10] sizes:[2:8.00 MiB 6:8.00 MiB 10:8.00 MiB] total:24.00 MiB
        Disk hdd total size:170440512 file_count:331
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9004 total size:170440512 file_count:331
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9005 hdd(volume:0/8 active:0 free:8 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:0/8 active:0 free:8 remote:0) id:0
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[3 7] sizes:[3:8.00 MiB 7:8.00 MiB] total:16.00 MiB
        Disk hdd total size:0 file_count:0
    Rack DefaultRack total size:511321536 file_count:993
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter total size:511321536 file_count:993
total size:511321536 file_count:993
```
2025-12-28 19:30:42 -08:00
chrislu 35fd1e1c9a optimize memory usage for large number of volumes
1. unwrap the map to avoid extra map object creation
2. fix ec shard counting in UpdateEcShards
2024-10-10 10:00:30 -07:00
chrislu 26dbc6c905 move to https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs 2022-07-29 00:17:28 -07:00
chrislu bc888226fc erasure coding: tracking encoded/decoded volumes
If an EC shard is created but not spread to other servers, the masterclient would think this shard is not located here.
2022-04-05 19:03:02 -07:00
Patrick Schmidt 7413d59750 Fix EC shard count logic
This fixes the calculation of the amount of EC shards a node holds.
Previously a global counter was increased, but also used inside the
loop to apply disk usage deltas. This led to wrong absolute numbers.
The fix is to apply only deltas of single EC shards per iteration.
2021-03-05 12:50:58 +01:00
Chris Lu 3097b9a9b7 fix existence checking 2021-02-16 05:59:43 -08:00
Chris Lu 3fe628f04e use hdd instead of empty string 2021-02-16 03:03:00 -08:00
Chris Lu f8446b42ab this can compile now!!! 2021-02-16 02:47:02 -08:00
Chris Lu 6b08db65b0 fix shard count reporting 2019-06-05 01:58:37 -07:00
Chris Lu eaa76f11b7 free volume slots factor in ec shard counts 2019-06-04 23:41:56 -07:00
Chris Lu 2215e81be7 ui add ec shard statuses 2019-06-04 21:52:37 -07:00
Chris Lu b58e25e588 broadcast vid->location map to master clients for ec chards 2019-05-26 00:49:15 -07:00
Chris Lu af67d99ca4 incrementally update master ec shards state 2019-05-26 00:21:17 -07:00
Chris Lu f0e6574d5e allocate ec shards to volume servers 2019-05-25 02:02:44 -07:00
Chris Lu 8838176d82 register ec shards to topology 2019-05-23 23:34:29 -07:00
Chris Lu 8a96445f40 register ec shards to each data node 2019-05-23 22:51:18 -07:00
Chris Lu 4659d80035 prepare to register ec shard info in master 2019-05-23 00:42:28 -07:00
Chris Lu 7180520889 ec shard info can be queried via VolumeList() 2019-05-22 22:44:28 -07:00