mirror of
https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs.git
synced 2026-09-15 11:00:51 +02:00
* perf(filer.sync): don't serialize descendants behind dir attribute updates The MetadataProcessor treated every in-flight directory job as a subtree barrier: any active dir job at /foo forced all file events under /foo to wait, and because the admit loop runs on the single stream.Recv() goroutine, a stalled descendant also stalled the whole gRPC stream. For large directories this turned every attribute-only dir event (mtime / xattr / chmod bumps) into a full-subtree pinch point. Classify dir jobs as barrier (create / delete / rename) vs non-barrier (filer_pb.IsUpdate on a directory — same parent and same name, i.e. an in-place attribute update). Only barrier dirs block descendants and get blocked by ancestor barrier dirs. Non-barrier dir updates still bump the ancestor descendantCount, so an incoming barrier dir on an ancestor still waits for them — preserving the "delete /a waits for in-flight /a/b update" safety. Tests cover the loosened cases and the preserved barriers: non-barrier update doesn't block a file descendant, barrier create still does, barrier delete still waits for in-flight descendants, and a barrier ancestor still waits for a non-barrier descendant update. * fix(filer.sync): serialize same-path barrier dir jobs against concurrent ops Review (Gemini) flagged that pathConflicts had latent same-path gaps that predated this PR but deserve fixing alongside the dir-conflict loosening: two barrier dir jobs at the same path could run concurrently (e.g. create /a and delete /a), and a file job at the same path as an in-flight barrier dir wasn't blocked either. Tighten pathConflicts so that: - an active barrier dir at p blocks every incoming job at p (file, barrier dir, or non-barrier attribute update) — same-path promotions, renames, and delete/create collisions must serialize; - an active file at p blocks incoming files and barrier dirs at p; - non-barrier dir updates at the same path still overlap with each other (attribute bumps are last-writer-wins, intentional). TestDirVsDirConflict and TestFileUnderActiveDirConflict flip their "same path does not conflict" assertions to match. New TestSamePathBarrierSerialization covers all five same-path cases explicitly. * fix(filer.sync): serialize incoming barrier dir against same-path non-barrier update Bug introduced by the previous same-path tightening commit and caught in review (CodeRabbit, critical): a kindNonBarrierDir at /dir1 was not indexed at its own path, so a later kindBarrierDir at /dir1 saw neither activeBarrierDirPaths["/dir1"] nor descendantCount["/dir1"] (the latter only counts strict descendants) and was admitted concurrently with the in-flight attribute update. That violated the "barrier at p serializes all work at p" rule. Track non-barrier dir jobs in a new activeNonBarrierDirPaths map and check it only from the incoming-barrier-dir branch of pathConflicts. The map is deliberately invisible to the ancestor check, so non-barrier updates still don't serialize file descendants — the loosening this PR is about stays intact. Regression test added in TestSamePathBarrierSerialization covers both the admission conflict and the index cleanup on job completion.
585 lines
21 KiB
Go
585 lines
21 KiB
Go
package command
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"container/heap"
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs/weed/pb/filer_pb"
|
|
"github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs/weed/util"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func makeResp(dir, name string, isDir bool, tsNs int64, isNew bool) *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse {
|
|
resp := &filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse{
|
|
Directory: dir,
|
|
TsNs: tsNs,
|
|
EventNotification: &filer_pb.EventNotification{},
|
|
}
|
|
entry := &filer_pb.Entry{
|
|
Name: name,
|
|
IsDirectory: isDir,
|
|
}
|
|
if isNew {
|
|
resp.EventNotification.NewEntry = entry
|
|
} else {
|
|
resp.EventNotification.OldEntry = entry
|
|
}
|
|
return resp
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// makeDirUpdateResp builds an in-place attribute update event for a directory
|
|
// (same parent and same name on both sides — matches filer_pb.IsUpdate).
|
|
func makeDirUpdateResp(parent, name string, tsNs int64) *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse {
|
|
return &filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse{
|
|
Directory: parent,
|
|
TsNs: tsNs,
|
|
EventNotification: &filer_pb.EventNotification{
|
|
OldEntry: &filer_pb.Entry{Name: name, IsDirectory: true},
|
|
NewEntry: &filer_pb.Entry{Name: name, IsDirectory: true},
|
|
NewParentPath: parent,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func makeRenameResp(oldDir, oldName, newDir, newName string, isDir bool, tsNs int64) *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse {
|
|
return &filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse{
|
|
Directory: oldDir,
|
|
TsNs: tsNs,
|
|
EventNotification: &filer_pb.EventNotification{
|
|
OldEntry: &filer_pb.Entry{
|
|
Name: oldName,
|
|
IsDirectory: isDir,
|
|
},
|
|
NewEntry: &filer_pb.Entry{
|
|
Name: newName,
|
|
IsDirectory: isDir,
|
|
},
|
|
NewParentPath: newDir,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestPathAncestors(t *testing.T) {
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
path util.FullPath
|
|
expected []util.FullPath
|
|
}{
|
|
{"/a/b/c/file.txt", []util.FullPath{"/a/b/c", "/a/b", "/a", "/"}},
|
|
{"/a/b", []util.FullPath{"/a", "/"}},
|
|
{"/a", []util.FullPath{"/"}},
|
|
{"/", nil},
|
|
}
|
|
for _, tt := range tests {
|
|
got := pathAncestors(tt.path)
|
|
if len(got) != len(tt.expected) {
|
|
t.Errorf("pathAncestors(%q) = %v, want %v", tt.path, got, tt.expected)
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
for i := range got {
|
|
if got[i] != tt.expected[i] {
|
|
t.Errorf("pathAncestors(%q)[%d] = %q, want %q", tt.path, i, got[i], tt.expected[i])
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestFileVsFileConflict verifies that two file operations on the same path conflict,
|
|
// and on different paths do not.
|
|
func TestFileVsFileConflict(t *testing.T) {
|
|
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
|
|
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
|
|
|
|
// Add a file job
|
|
active := makeResp("/dir1", "file.txt", false, 1, true)
|
|
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
|
|
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
|
|
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
|
|
|
|
// Same file should conflict
|
|
same := makeResp("/dir1", "file.txt", false, 2, true)
|
|
if !p.conflictsWith(same) {
|
|
t.Error("expected conflict for same file path")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Different file should not conflict
|
|
diff := makeResp("/dir1", "other.txt", false, 3, true)
|
|
if p.conflictsWith(diff) {
|
|
t.Error("unexpected conflict for different file path")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// File in different directory should not conflict
|
|
diffDir := makeResp("/dir2", "file.txt", false, 4, true)
|
|
if p.conflictsWith(diffDir) {
|
|
t.Error("unexpected conflict for file in different directory")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestFileUnderActiveDirConflict verifies that a file under an active directory operation
|
|
// conflicts, but a file outside does not.
|
|
func TestFileUnderActiveDirConflict(t *testing.T) {
|
|
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
|
|
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
|
|
|
|
// Add a directory job at /dir1
|
|
active := makeResp("/", "dir1", true, 1, true)
|
|
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
|
|
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
|
|
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
|
|
|
|
// File under /dir1 should conflict
|
|
under := makeResp("/dir1", "file.txt", false, 2, true)
|
|
if !p.conflictsWith(under) {
|
|
t.Error("expected conflict for file under active directory")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// File deeply nested under /dir1 should conflict
|
|
deep := makeResp("/dir1/sub/deep", "file.txt", false, 3, true)
|
|
if !p.conflictsWith(deep) {
|
|
t.Error("expected conflict for deeply nested file under active directory")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// File in /dir2 should not conflict
|
|
outside := makeResp("/dir2", "file.txt", false, 4, true)
|
|
if p.conflictsWith(outside) {
|
|
t.Error("unexpected conflict for file outside active directory")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// File at /dir1 itself (not under, at) SHOULD conflict with an active
|
|
// barrier dir at /dir1 — same-path promotions must serialize.
|
|
atSame := makeResp("/", "dir1", false, 5, true)
|
|
if !p.conflictsWith(atSame) {
|
|
t.Error("expected conflict for file at same path as active barrier dir")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestDirWithActiveFileUnder verifies that a directory operation conflicts when
|
|
// there are active file jobs under it.
|
|
func TestDirWithActiveFileUnder(t *testing.T) {
|
|
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
|
|
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
|
|
|
|
// Add file jobs under /dir1
|
|
f1 := makeResp("/dir1/sub", "file.txt", false, 1, true)
|
|
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(f1)
|
|
p.activeJobs[f1.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
|
|
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
|
|
|
|
// Directory /dir1 should conflict (has active file under it)
|
|
dirOp := makeResp("/", "dir1", true, 2, true)
|
|
if !p.conflictsWith(dirOp) {
|
|
t.Error("expected conflict for directory with active file under it")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Directory /dir2 should not conflict
|
|
dirOp2 := makeResp("/", "dir2", true, 3, true)
|
|
if p.conflictsWith(dirOp2) {
|
|
t.Error("unexpected conflict for directory with no active jobs under it")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestDirVsDirConflict verifies ancestor/descendant directory conflict detection.
|
|
func TestDirVsDirConflict(t *testing.T) {
|
|
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
|
|
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
|
|
|
|
// Add directory job at /a/b
|
|
active := makeResp("/a", "b", true, 1, true)
|
|
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
|
|
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
|
|
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
|
|
|
|
// /a/b/c (descendant) should conflict
|
|
desc := makeResp("/a/b", "c", true, 2, true)
|
|
if !p.conflictsWith(desc) {
|
|
t.Error("expected conflict for descendant directory")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// /a (ancestor) should conflict
|
|
anc := makeResp("/", "a", true, 3, true)
|
|
if !p.conflictsWith(anc) {
|
|
t.Error("expected conflict for ancestor directory")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Same-path barrier dir SHOULD conflict: concurrent create/delete/rename
|
|
// on the same directory must serialize.
|
|
same := makeResp("/a", "b", true, 4, true)
|
|
if !p.conflictsWith(same) {
|
|
t.Error("expected conflict for same-path barrier directory")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Sibling directory should not conflict
|
|
sibling := makeResp("/a", "c", true, 5, true)
|
|
if p.conflictsWith(sibling) {
|
|
t.Error("unexpected conflict for sibling directory")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestRenameConflict verifies that rename events with two paths check both paths.
|
|
func TestRenameConflict(t *testing.T) {
|
|
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
|
|
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
|
|
|
|
// Add file job at /dir1/file.txt
|
|
f1 := makeResp("/dir1", "file.txt", false, 1, true)
|
|
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(f1)
|
|
p.activeJobs[f1.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
|
|
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
|
|
|
|
// Rename from /dir2/a.txt to /dir1/file.txt should conflict (newPath matches)
|
|
rename := makeRenameResp("/dir2", "a.txt", "/dir1", "file.txt", false, 2)
|
|
if !p.conflictsWith(rename) {
|
|
t.Error("expected conflict for rename whose destination matches active file")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Rename from /dir1/file.txt to /dir2/b.txt should conflict (oldPath matches)
|
|
rename2 := makeRenameResp("/dir1", "file.txt", "/dir2", "b.txt", false, 3)
|
|
if !p.conflictsWith(rename2) {
|
|
t.Error("expected conflict for rename whose source matches active file")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Rename between unrelated paths should not conflict
|
|
rename3 := makeRenameResp("/dir3", "x.txt", "/dir4", "y.txt", false, 4)
|
|
if p.conflictsWith(rename3) {
|
|
t.Error("unexpected conflict for rename between unrelated paths")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestActiveRenameConflict verifies that an active rename job registers both paths.
|
|
func TestActiveRenameConflict(t *testing.T) {
|
|
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
|
|
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
|
|
|
|
// Add active rename job: /dir1/old.txt -> /dir2/new.txt
|
|
rename := makeRenameResp("/dir1", "old.txt", "/dir2", "new.txt", false, 1)
|
|
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(rename)
|
|
p.activeJobs[rename.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
|
|
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
|
|
if newPath != "" {
|
|
p.addPathToIndex(newPath, kind)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// File at /dir1/old.txt should conflict
|
|
f1 := makeResp("/dir1", "old.txt", false, 2, true)
|
|
if !p.conflictsWith(f1) {
|
|
t.Error("expected conflict at rename source path")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// File at /dir2/new.txt should conflict
|
|
f2 := makeResp("/dir2", "new.txt", false, 3, true)
|
|
if !p.conflictsWith(f2) {
|
|
t.Error("expected conflict at rename destination path")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// File at unrelated path should not conflict
|
|
f3 := makeResp("/dir3", "other.txt", false, 4, true)
|
|
if p.conflictsWith(f3) {
|
|
t.Error("unexpected conflict at unrelated path")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestRootDirConflict verifies that an active job at / conflicts with everything.
|
|
func TestRootDirConflict(t *testing.T) {
|
|
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
|
|
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
|
|
|
|
// Add directory job at /
|
|
// Note: a dir entry at "/" would be created as FullPath("/").Child("somedir")
|
|
// But let's test what happens with an active dir at /some/path and check root
|
|
active := makeResp("/some", "dir", true, 1, true)
|
|
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
|
|
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
|
|
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
|
|
|
|
// Root dir should conflict because active dir /some/dir is under /
|
|
// A new directory at "/" should see descendantCount["/"] > 0
|
|
if p.descendantCount["/"] <= 0 {
|
|
t.Error("expected descendantCount['/'] > 0 for active job under root")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestIndexCleanup verifies that removing a job properly cleans up all indexes.
|
|
func TestIndexCleanup(t *testing.T) {
|
|
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
|
|
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
|
|
|
|
// Add then remove a file job
|
|
path := util.FullPath("/a/b/c/file.txt")
|
|
p.addPathToIndex(path, kindFile)
|
|
|
|
if p.activeFilePaths[path] != 1 {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected activeFilePaths count 1, got %d", p.activeFilePaths[path])
|
|
}
|
|
if p.descendantCount["/a/b/c"] != 1 {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected descendantCount['/a/b/c'] = 1, got %d", p.descendantCount["/a/b/c"])
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
p.removePathFromIndex(path, kindFile)
|
|
|
|
if len(p.activeFilePaths) != 0 {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected empty activeFilePaths after removal, got %v", p.activeFilePaths)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(p.descendantCount) != 0 {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected empty descendantCount after removal, got %v", p.descendantCount)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestWatermarkWithHeap verifies watermark advancement using the min-heap.
|
|
func TestWatermarkWithHeap(t *testing.T) {
|
|
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
|
|
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
|
|
|
|
// Simulate adding jobs in order
|
|
for _, ts := range []int64{10, 20, 30} {
|
|
jobPath := util.FullPath("/file" + string(rune('0'+ts/10)))
|
|
p.activeJobs[ts] = &syncJobPaths{path: jobPath, kind: kindFile}
|
|
p.addPathToIndex(jobPath, kindFile)
|
|
heap.Push(&p.tsHeap, ts)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if p.tsHeap[0] != 10 {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected heap min=10, got %d", p.tsHeap[0])
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Remove non-oldest (ts=20) — heap top should stay 10
|
|
delete(p.activeJobs, 20)
|
|
p.removePathFromIndex("/file2", kindFile)
|
|
// Lazy clean: top is 10 which is still active, so no pop
|
|
for p.tsHeap.Len() > 0 {
|
|
if _, active := p.activeJobs[p.tsHeap[0]]; active {
|
|
break
|
|
}
|
|
heap.Pop(&p.tsHeap)
|
|
}
|
|
if p.tsHeap[0] != 10 {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected heap min=10 after removing 20, got %d", p.tsHeap[0])
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Remove oldest (ts=10) — lazy clean should find 30
|
|
delete(p.activeJobs, 10)
|
|
p.removePathFromIndex("/file1", kindFile)
|
|
for p.tsHeap.Len() > 0 {
|
|
if _, active := p.activeJobs[p.tsHeap[0]]; active {
|
|
break
|
|
}
|
|
heap.Pop(&p.tsHeap)
|
|
}
|
|
if p.tsHeap.Len() != 1 || p.tsHeap[0] != 30 {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected heap min=30 after removing 10 and 20, got len=%d", p.tsHeap.Len())
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestNonBarrierDirUpdateDoesNotBlockDescendants verifies the loosened
|
|
// dir-conflict rule: an attribute-only directory update (same parent + same
|
|
// name) must NOT block file events under that directory. A barrier dir event
|
|
// (create/delete/rename) on the same path still must.
|
|
func TestNonBarrierDirUpdateDoesNotBlockDescendants(t *testing.T) {
|
|
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
|
|
|
|
t.Run("attribute update on /dir1 does not block file under it", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
|
|
|
|
// Active non-barrier: attribute update on /dir1.
|
|
active := makeDirUpdateResp("/", "dir1", 1)
|
|
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
|
|
if kind != kindNonBarrierDir {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected kindNonBarrierDir for dir attribute update, got %v", kind)
|
|
}
|
|
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
|
|
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
|
|
|
|
// File under /dir1 should NOT conflict with the attribute update.
|
|
under := makeResp("/dir1", "file.txt", false, 2, true)
|
|
if p.conflictsWith(under) {
|
|
t.Error("file under a non-barrier dir update should not conflict")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Nested file should also not conflict.
|
|
deep := makeResp("/dir1/sub/deep", "file.txt", false, 3, true)
|
|
if p.conflictsWith(deep) {
|
|
t.Error("deeply nested file under a non-barrier dir update should not conflict")
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("barrier dir create at the same path still blocks descendants", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
|
|
|
|
active := makeResp("/", "dir1", true, 1, true) // create
|
|
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
|
|
if kind != kindBarrierDir {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected kindBarrierDir for dir create, got %v", kind)
|
|
}
|
|
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
|
|
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
|
|
|
|
under := makeResp("/dir1", "file.txt", false, 2, true)
|
|
if !p.conflictsWith(under) {
|
|
t.Error("file under an active barrier dir create should still conflict")
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("barrier dir delete still waits for in-flight descendants", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
|
|
|
|
// Active file under /dir1.
|
|
f := makeResp("/dir1", "file.txt", false, 1, true)
|
|
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(f)
|
|
p.activeJobs[f.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
|
|
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
|
|
|
|
// Incoming barrier delete on /dir1 should still wait for the
|
|
// in-flight file descendant.
|
|
del := makeResp("/", "dir1", true, 2, false)
|
|
if !p.conflictsWith(del) {
|
|
t.Error("barrier dir delete should wait for descendant file job")
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("non-barrier dir update still keeps ancestor barrier waiting", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
|
|
|
|
// Active non-barrier dir update at /a/b.
|
|
upd := makeDirUpdateResp("/a", "b", 1)
|
|
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(upd)
|
|
p.activeJobs[upd.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
|
|
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
|
|
|
|
// A barrier delete on /a (the ancestor) should wait for it.
|
|
del := makeResp("/", "a", true, 2, false)
|
|
if !p.conflictsWith(del) {
|
|
t.Error("barrier ancestor dir delete should wait for non-barrier descendant update")
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestSamePathBarrierSerialization verifies the tightened same-path rules:
|
|
// a barrier dir in flight at p serializes every other job at p (file, barrier
|
|
// dir, or non-barrier update), and a file in flight at p serializes incoming
|
|
// files and barrier dirs at p.
|
|
func TestSamePathBarrierSerialization(t *testing.T) {
|
|
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
|
|
|
|
t.Run("barrier dir at p blocks same-path file", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
|
|
active := makeResp("/", "dir1", true, 1, true) // dir create
|
|
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
|
|
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
|
|
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
|
|
|
|
file := makeResp("/", "dir1", false, 2, true)
|
|
if !p.conflictsWith(file) {
|
|
t.Error("file at path of active barrier dir should conflict")
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("barrier dir at p blocks another same-path barrier dir", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
|
|
active := makeResp("/", "dir1", true, 1, true) // dir create
|
|
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
|
|
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
|
|
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
|
|
|
|
del := makeResp("/", "dir1", true, 2, false) // dir delete, same path
|
|
if !p.conflictsWith(del) {
|
|
t.Error("concurrent create/delete on same dir path should conflict")
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("barrier dir at p blocks non-barrier update at same path", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
|
|
active := makeResp("/", "dir1", true, 1, true) // dir create
|
|
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
|
|
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
|
|
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
|
|
|
|
upd := makeDirUpdateResp("/", "dir1", 2)
|
|
if !p.conflictsWith(upd) {
|
|
t.Error("attribute update on dir being created should wait for the create")
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("file at p blocks same-path barrier dir", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
|
|
active := makeResp("/", "thing", false, 1, true) // file create at /thing
|
|
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
|
|
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
|
|
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
|
|
|
|
// Barrier dir at /thing (e.g. a file→dir promotion) must wait.
|
|
promoteDir := makeResp("/", "thing", true, 2, true)
|
|
if !p.conflictsWith(promoteDir) {
|
|
t.Error("barrier dir at path of active file should conflict")
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("non-barrier update at p blocks incoming barrier dir at same path", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Regression test for a bug spotted in review: an in-flight
|
|
// attribute update on /dir1 must serialize against a later
|
|
// delete/rename/create on /dir1.
|
|
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
|
|
active := makeDirUpdateResp("/", "dir1", 1)
|
|
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
|
|
if kind != kindNonBarrierDir {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected kindNonBarrierDir, got %v", kind)
|
|
}
|
|
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
|
|
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
|
|
|
|
del := makeResp("/", "dir1", true, 2, false) // dir delete
|
|
if !p.conflictsWith(del) {
|
|
t.Error("barrier dir at path of active non-barrier update should conflict")
|
|
}
|
|
// Ensure the removal path also cleans up the non-barrier index.
|
|
p.removePathFromIndex(path, kind)
|
|
if len(p.activeNonBarrierDirPaths) != 0 {
|
|
t.Errorf("activeNonBarrierDirPaths not cleaned up, got %v", p.activeNonBarrierDirPaths)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("non-barrier update at p does NOT block same-path non-barrier update", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
|
|
active := makeDirUpdateResp("/", "dir1", 1)
|
|
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
|
|
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
|
|
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
|
|
|
|
// Concurrent attribute bumps are allowed: last writer wins.
|
|
upd2 := makeDirUpdateResp("/", "dir1", 2)
|
|
if p.conflictsWith(upd2) {
|
|
t.Error("concurrent non-barrier dir updates should not conflict")
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// benchResult prevents the compiler from optimizing away the conflict check.
|
|
var benchResult bool
|
|
|
|
// BenchmarkConflictCheck measures conflict check cost with varying active job counts.
|
|
// With the index-based approach, cost should be O(depth) regardless of job count.
|
|
func BenchmarkConflictCheck(b *testing.B) {
|
|
for _, numJobs := range []int{32, 256, 1024} {
|
|
b.Run(fmt.Sprintf("jobs=%d", numJobs), func(b *testing.B) {
|
|
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
|
|
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, numJobs+1, 0)
|
|
|
|
// Fill with active jobs in different directories
|
|
for i := range numJobs {
|
|
dir := fmt.Sprintf("/dir%d/sub%d", i/100, i%100)
|
|
name := fmt.Sprintf("file%d.txt", i)
|
|
resp := makeResp(dir, name, false, int64(i+1), true)
|
|
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(resp)
|
|
p.activeJobs[resp.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
|
|
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Benchmark conflict check for a non-conflicting event
|
|
probe := makeResp("/other/path", "test.txt", false, int64(numJobs+1), true)
|
|
var r bool
|
|
b.ResetTimer()
|
|
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
|
|
r = p.conflictsWith(probe)
|
|
}
|
|
benchResult = r
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|