Files
seaweedfs/weed/command/filer_sync_jobs_test.go
T
Chris Lu c2f5db3a02 perf(filer.sync): don't serialize descendants behind dir attribute updates (#9079)
* perf(filer.sync): don't serialize descendants behind dir attribute updates

The MetadataProcessor treated every in-flight directory job as a subtree
barrier: any active dir job at /foo forced all file events under /foo to
wait, and because the admit loop runs on the single stream.Recv()
goroutine, a stalled descendant also stalled the whole gRPC stream. For
large directories this turned every attribute-only dir event (mtime /
xattr / chmod bumps) into a full-subtree pinch point.

Classify dir jobs as barrier (create / delete / rename) vs non-barrier
(filer_pb.IsUpdate on a directory — same parent and same name, i.e. an
in-place attribute update). Only barrier dirs block descendants and get
blocked by ancestor barrier dirs. Non-barrier dir updates still bump the
ancestor descendantCount, so an incoming barrier dir on an ancestor
still waits for them — preserving the "delete /a waits for in-flight
/a/b update" safety.

Tests cover the loosened cases and the preserved barriers:
non-barrier update doesn't block a file descendant, barrier create
still does, barrier delete still waits for in-flight descendants, and
a barrier ancestor still waits for a non-barrier descendant update.

* fix(filer.sync): serialize same-path barrier dir jobs against concurrent ops

Review (Gemini) flagged that pathConflicts had latent same-path gaps
that predated this PR but deserve fixing alongside the dir-conflict
loosening: two barrier dir jobs at the same path could run concurrently
(e.g. create /a and delete /a), and a file job at the same path as an
in-flight barrier dir wasn't blocked either.

Tighten pathConflicts so that:
- an active barrier dir at p blocks every incoming job at p (file,
  barrier dir, or non-barrier attribute update) — same-path promotions,
  renames, and delete/create collisions must serialize;
- an active file at p blocks incoming files and barrier dirs at p;
- non-barrier dir updates at the same path still overlap with each
  other (attribute bumps are last-writer-wins, intentional).

TestDirVsDirConflict and TestFileUnderActiveDirConflict flip their
"same path does not conflict" assertions to match. New
TestSamePathBarrierSerialization covers all five same-path cases
explicitly.

* fix(filer.sync): serialize incoming barrier dir against same-path non-barrier update

Bug introduced by the previous same-path tightening commit and caught
in review (CodeRabbit, critical): a kindNonBarrierDir at /dir1 was not
indexed at its own path, so a later kindBarrierDir at /dir1 saw neither
activeBarrierDirPaths["/dir1"] nor descendantCount["/dir1"] (the latter
only counts strict descendants) and was admitted concurrently with the
in-flight attribute update. That violated the "barrier at p serializes
all work at p" rule.

Track non-barrier dir jobs in a new activeNonBarrierDirPaths map and
check it only from the incoming-barrier-dir branch of pathConflicts.
The map is deliberately invisible to the ancestor check, so non-barrier
updates still don't serialize file descendants — the loosening this PR
is about stays intact.

Regression test added in TestSamePathBarrierSerialization covers both
the admission conflict and the index cleanup on job completion.
2026-04-14 18:34:05 -07:00

585 lines
21 KiB
Go

package command
import (
"container/heap"
"fmt"
"testing"
"github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs/weed/pb/filer_pb"
"github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs/weed/util"
)
func makeResp(dir, name string, isDir bool, tsNs int64, isNew bool) *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse {
resp := &filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse{
Directory: dir,
TsNs: tsNs,
EventNotification: &filer_pb.EventNotification{},
}
entry := &filer_pb.Entry{
Name: name,
IsDirectory: isDir,
}
if isNew {
resp.EventNotification.NewEntry = entry
} else {
resp.EventNotification.OldEntry = entry
}
return resp
}
// makeDirUpdateResp builds an in-place attribute update event for a directory
// (same parent and same name on both sides — matches filer_pb.IsUpdate).
func makeDirUpdateResp(parent, name string, tsNs int64) *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse {
return &filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse{
Directory: parent,
TsNs: tsNs,
EventNotification: &filer_pb.EventNotification{
OldEntry: &filer_pb.Entry{Name: name, IsDirectory: true},
NewEntry: &filer_pb.Entry{Name: name, IsDirectory: true},
NewParentPath: parent,
},
}
}
func makeRenameResp(oldDir, oldName, newDir, newName string, isDir bool, tsNs int64) *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse {
return &filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse{
Directory: oldDir,
TsNs: tsNs,
EventNotification: &filer_pb.EventNotification{
OldEntry: &filer_pb.Entry{
Name: oldName,
IsDirectory: isDir,
},
NewEntry: &filer_pb.Entry{
Name: newName,
IsDirectory: isDir,
},
NewParentPath: newDir,
},
}
}
func TestPathAncestors(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
path util.FullPath
expected []util.FullPath
}{
{"/a/b/c/file.txt", []util.FullPath{"/a/b/c", "/a/b", "/a", "/"}},
{"/a/b", []util.FullPath{"/a", "/"}},
{"/a", []util.FullPath{"/"}},
{"/", nil},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
got := pathAncestors(tt.path)
if len(got) != len(tt.expected) {
t.Errorf("pathAncestors(%q) = %v, want %v", tt.path, got, tt.expected)
continue
}
for i := range got {
if got[i] != tt.expected[i] {
t.Errorf("pathAncestors(%q)[%d] = %q, want %q", tt.path, i, got[i], tt.expected[i])
}
}
}
}
// TestFileVsFileConflict verifies that two file operations on the same path conflict,
// and on different paths do not.
func TestFileVsFileConflict(t *testing.T) {
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
// Add a file job
active := makeResp("/dir1", "file.txt", false, 1, true)
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
// Same file should conflict
same := makeResp("/dir1", "file.txt", false, 2, true)
if !p.conflictsWith(same) {
t.Error("expected conflict for same file path")
}
// Different file should not conflict
diff := makeResp("/dir1", "other.txt", false, 3, true)
if p.conflictsWith(diff) {
t.Error("unexpected conflict for different file path")
}
// File in different directory should not conflict
diffDir := makeResp("/dir2", "file.txt", false, 4, true)
if p.conflictsWith(diffDir) {
t.Error("unexpected conflict for file in different directory")
}
}
// TestFileUnderActiveDirConflict verifies that a file under an active directory operation
// conflicts, but a file outside does not.
func TestFileUnderActiveDirConflict(t *testing.T) {
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
// Add a directory job at /dir1
active := makeResp("/", "dir1", true, 1, true)
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
// File under /dir1 should conflict
under := makeResp("/dir1", "file.txt", false, 2, true)
if !p.conflictsWith(under) {
t.Error("expected conflict for file under active directory")
}
// File deeply nested under /dir1 should conflict
deep := makeResp("/dir1/sub/deep", "file.txt", false, 3, true)
if !p.conflictsWith(deep) {
t.Error("expected conflict for deeply nested file under active directory")
}
// File in /dir2 should not conflict
outside := makeResp("/dir2", "file.txt", false, 4, true)
if p.conflictsWith(outside) {
t.Error("unexpected conflict for file outside active directory")
}
// File at /dir1 itself (not under, at) SHOULD conflict with an active
// barrier dir at /dir1 — same-path promotions must serialize.
atSame := makeResp("/", "dir1", false, 5, true)
if !p.conflictsWith(atSame) {
t.Error("expected conflict for file at same path as active barrier dir")
}
}
// TestDirWithActiveFileUnder verifies that a directory operation conflicts when
// there are active file jobs under it.
func TestDirWithActiveFileUnder(t *testing.T) {
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
// Add file jobs under /dir1
f1 := makeResp("/dir1/sub", "file.txt", false, 1, true)
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(f1)
p.activeJobs[f1.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
// Directory /dir1 should conflict (has active file under it)
dirOp := makeResp("/", "dir1", true, 2, true)
if !p.conflictsWith(dirOp) {
t.Error("expected conflict for directory with active file under it")
}
// Directory /dir2 should not conflict
dirOp2 := makeResp("/", "dir2", true, 3, true)
if p.conflictsWith(dirOp2) {
t.Error("unexpected conflict for directory with no active jobs under it")
}
}
// TestDirVsDirConflict verifies ancestor/descendant directory conflict detection.
func TestDirVsDirConflict(t *testing.T) {
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
// Add directory job at /a/b
active := makeResp("/a", "b", true, 1, true)
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
// /a/b/c (descendant) should conflict
desc := makeResp("/a/b", "c", true, 2, true)
if !p.conflictsWith(desc) {
t.Error("expected conflict for descendant directory")
}
// /a (ancestor) should conflict
anc := makeResp("/", "a", true, 3, true)
if !p.conflictsWith(anc) {
t.Error("expected conflict for ancestor directory")
}
// Same-path barrier dir SHOULD conflict: concurrent create/delete/rename
// on the same directory must serialize.
same := makeResp("/a", "b", true, 4, true)
if !p.conflictsWith(same) {
t.Error("expected conflict for same-path barrier directory")
}
// Sibling directory should not conflict
sibling := makeResp("/a", "c", true, 5, true)
if p.conflictsWith(sibling) {
t.Error("unexpected conflict for sibling directory")
}
}
// TestRenameConflict verifies that rename events with two paths check both paths.
func TestRenameConflict(t *testing.T) {
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
// Add file job at /dir1/file.txt
f1 := makeResp("/dir1", "file.txt", false, 1, true)
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(f1)
p.activeJobs[f1.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
// Rename from /dir2/a.txt to /dir1/file.txt should conflict (newPath matches)
rename := makeRenameResp("/dir2", "a.txt", "/dir1", "file.txt", false, 2)
if !p.conflictsWith(rename) {
t.Error("expected conflict for rename whose destination matches active file")
}
// Rename from /dir1/file.txt to /dir2/b.txt should conflict (oldPath matches)
rename2 := makeRenameResp("/dir1", "file.txt", "/dir2", "b.txt", false, 3)
if !p.conflictsWith(rename2) {
t.Error("expected conflict for rename whose source matches active file")
}
// Rename between unrelated paths should not conflict
rename3 := makeRenameResp("/dir3", "x.txt", "/dir4", "y.txt", false, 4)
if p.conflictsWith(rename3) {
t.Error("unexpected conflict for rename between unrelated paths")
}
}
// TestActiveRenameConflict verifies that an active rename job registers both paths.
func TestActiveRenameConflict(t *testing.T) {
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
// Add active rename job: /dir1/old.txt -> /dir2/new.txt
rename := makeRenameResp("/dir1", "old.txt", "/dir2", "new.txt", false, 1)
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(rename)
p.activeJobs[rename.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
if newPath != "" {
p.addPathToIndex(newPath, kind)
}
// File at /dir1/old.txt should conflict
f1 := makeResp("/dir1", "old.txt", false, 2, true)
if !p.conflictsWith(f1) {
t.Error("expected conflict at rename source path")
}
// File at /dir2/new.txt should conflict
f2 := makeResp("/dir2", "new.txt", false, 3, true)
if !p.conflictsWith(f2) {
t.Error("expected conflict at rename destination path")
}
// File at unrelated path should not conflict
f3 := makeResp("/dir3", "other.txt", false, 4, true)
if p.conflictsWith(f3) {
t.Error("unexpected conflict at unrelated path")
}
}
// TestRootDirConflict verifies that an active job at / conflicts with everything.
func TestRootDirConflict(t *testing.T) {
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
// Add directory job at /
// Note: a dir entry at "/" would be created as FullPath("/").Child("somedir")
// But let's test what happens with an active dir at /some/path and check root
active := makeResp("/some", "dir", true, 1, true)
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
// Root dir should conflict because active dir /some/dir is under /
// A new directory at "/" should see descendantCount["/"] > 0
if p.descendantCount["/"] <= 0 {
t.Error("expected descendantCount['/'] > 0 for active job under root")
}
}
// TestIndexCleanup verifies that removing a job properly cleans up all indexes.
func TestIndexCleanup(t *testing.T) {
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
// Add then remove a file job
path := util.FullPath("/a/b/c/file.txt")
p.addPathToIndex(path, kindFile)
if p.activeFilePaths[path] != 1 {
t.Errorf("expected activeFilePaths count 1, got %d", p.activeFilePaths[path])
}
if p.descendantCount["/a/b/c"] != 1 {
t.Errorf("expected descendantCount['/a/b/c'] = 1, got %d", p.descendantCount["/a/b/c"])
}
p.removePathFromIndex(path, kindFile)
if len(p.activeFilePaths) != 0 {
t.Errorf("expected empty activeFilePaths after removal, got %v", p.activeFilePaths)
}
if len(p.descendantCount) != 0 {
t.Errorf("expected empty descendantCount after removal, got %v", p.descendantCount)
}
}
// TestWatermarkWithHeap verifies watermark advancement using the min-heap.
func TestWatermarkWithHeap(t *testing.T) {
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
// Simulate adding jobs in order
for _, ts := range []int64{10, 20, 30} {
jobPath := util.FullPath("/file" + string(rune('0'+ts/10)))
p.activeJobs[ts] = &syncJobPaths{path: jobPath, kind: kindFile}
p.addPathToIndex(jobPath, kindFile)
heap.Push(&p.tsHeap, ts)
}
if p.tsHeap[0] != 10 {
t.Errorf("expected heap min=10, got %d", p.tsHeap[0])
}
// Remove non-oldest (ts=20) — heap top should stay 10
delete(p.activeJobs, 20)
p.removePathFromIndex("/file2", kindFile)
// Lazy clean: top is 10 which is still active, so no pop
for p.tsHeap.Len() > 0 {
if _, active := p.activeJobs[p.tsHeap[0]]; active {
break
}
heap.Pop(&p.tsHeap)
}
if p.tsHeap[0] != 10 {
t.Errorf("expected heap min=10 after removing 20, got %d", p.tsHeap[0])
}
// Remove oldest (ts=10) — lazy clean should find 30
delete(p.activeJobs, 10)
p.removePathFromIndex("/file1", kindFile)
for p.tsHeap.Len() > 0 {
if _, active := p.activeJobs[p.tsHeap[0]]; active {
break
}
heap.Pop(&p.tsHeap)
}
if p.tsHeap.Len() != 1 || p.tsHeap[0] != 30 {
t.Errorf("expected heap min=30 after removing 10 and 20, got len=%d", p.tsHeap.Len())
}
}
// TestNonBarrierDirUpdateDoesNotBlockDescendants verifies the loosened
// dir-conflict rule: an attribute-only directory update (same parent + same
// name) must NOT block file events under that directory. A barrier dir event
// (create/delete/rename) on the same path still must.
func TestNonBarrierDirUpdateDoesNotBlockDescendants(t *testing.T) {
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
t.Run("attribute update on /dir1 does not block file under it", func(t *testing.T) {
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
// Active non-barrier: attribute update on /dir1.
active := makeDirUpdateResp("/", "dir1", 1)
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
if kind != kindNonBarrierDir {
t.Fatalf("expected kindNonBarrierDir for dir attribute update, got %v", kind)
}
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
// File under /dir1 should NOT conflict with the attribute update.
under := makeResp("/dir1", "file.txt", false, 2, true)
if p.conflictsWith(under) {
t.Error("file under a non-barrier dir update should not conflict")
}
// Nested file should also not conflict.
deep := makeResp("/dir1/sub/deep", "file.txt", false, 3, true)
if p.conflictsWith(deep) {
t.Error("deeply nested file under a non-barrier dir update should not conflict")
}
})
t.Run("barrier dir create at the same path still blocks descendants", func(t *testing.T) {
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
active := makeResp("/", "dir1", true, 1, true) // create
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
if kind != kindBarrierDir {
t.Fatalf("expected kindBarrierDir for dir create, got %v", kind)
}
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
under := makeResp("/dir1", "file.txt", false, 2, true)
if !p.conflictsWith(under) {
t.Error("file under an active barrier dir create should still conflict")
}
})
t.Run("barrier dir delete still waits for in-flight descendants", func(t *testing.T) {
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
// Active file under /dir1.
f := makeResp("/dir1", "file.txt", false, 1, true)
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(f)
p.activeJobs[f.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
// Incoming barrier delete on /dir1 should still wait for the
// in-flight file descendant.
del := makeResp("/", "dir1", true, 2, false)
if !p.conflictsWith(del) {
t.Error("barrier dir delete should wait for descendant file job")
}
})
t.Run("non-barrier dir update still keeps ancestor barrier waiting", func(t *testing.T) {
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
// Active non-barrier dir update at /a/b.
upd := makeDirUpdateResp("/a", "b", 1)
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(upd)
p.activeJobs[upd.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
// A barrier delete on /a (the ancestor) should wait for it.
del := makeResp("/", "a", true, 2, false)
if !p.conflictsWith(del) {
t.Error("barrier ancestor dir delete should wait for non-barrier descendant update")
}
})
}
// TestSamePathBarrierSerialization verifies the tightened same-path rules:
// a barrier dir in flight at p serializes every other job at p (file, barrier
// dir, or non-barrier update), and a file in flight at p serializes incoming
// files and barrier dirs at p.
func TestSamePathBarrierSerialization(t *testing.T) {
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
t.Run("barrier dir at p blocks same-path file", func(t *testing.T) {
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
active := makeResp("/", "dir1", true, 1, true) // dir create
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
file := makeResp("/", "dir1", false, 2, true)
if !p.conflictsWith(file) {
t.Error("file at path of active barrier dir should conflict")
}
})
t.Run("barrier dir at p blocks another same-path barrier dir", func(t *testing.T) {
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
active := makeResp("/", "dir1", true, 1, true) // dir create
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
del := makeResp("/", "dir1", true, 2, false) // dir delete, same path
if !p.conflictsWith(del) {
t.Error("concurrent create/delete on same dir path should conflict")
}
})
t.Run("barrier dir at p blocks non-barrier update at same path", func(t *testing.T) {
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
active := makeResp("/", "dir1", true, 1, true) // dir create
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
upd := makeDirUpdateResp("/", "dir1", 2)
if !p.conflictsWith(upd) {
t.Error("attribute update on dir being created should wait for the create")
}
})
t.Run("file at p blocks same-path barrier dir", func(t *testing.T) {
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
active := makeResp("/", "thing", false, 1, true) // file create at /thing
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
// Barrier dir at /thing (e.g. a file→dir promotion) must wait.
promoteDir := makeResp("/", "thing", true, 2, true)
if !p.conflictsWith(promoteDir) {
t.Error("barrier dir at path of active file should conflict")
}
})
t.Run("non-barrier update at p blocks incoming barrier dir at same path", func(t *testing.T) {
// Regression test for a bug spotted in review: an in-flight
// attribute update on /dir1 must serialize against a later
// delete/rename/create on /dir1.
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
active := makeDirUpdateResp("/", "dir1", 1)
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
if kind != kindNonBarrierDir {
t.Fatalf("expected kindNonBarrierDir, got %v", kind)
}
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
del := makeResp("/", "dir1", true, 2, false) // dir delete
if !p.conflictsWith(del) {
t.Error("barrier dir at path of active non-barrier update should conflict")
}
// Ensure the removal path also cleans up the non-barrier index.
p.removePathFromIndex(path, kind)
if len(p.activeNonBarrierDirPaths) != 0 {
t.Errorf("activeNonBarrierDirPaths not cleaned up, got %v", p.activeNonBarrierDirPaths)
}
})
t.Run("non-barrier update at p does NOT block same-path non-barrier update", func(t *testing.T) {
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, 100, 0)
active := makeDirUpdateResp("/", "dir1", 1)
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(active)
p.activeJobs[active.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
// Concurrent attribute bumps are allowed: last writer wins.
upd2 := makeDirUpdateResp("/", "dir1", 2)
if p.conflictsWith(upd2) {
t.Error("concurrent non-barrier dir updates should not conflict")
}
})
}
// benchResult prevents the compiler from optimizing away the conflict check.
var benchResult bool
// BenchmarkConflictCheck measures conflict check cost with varying active job counts.
// With the index-based approach, cost should be O(depth) regardless of job count.
func BenchmarkConflictCheck(b *testing.B) {
for _, numJobs := range []int{32, 256, 1024} {
b.Run(fmt.Sprintf("jobs=%d", numJobs), func(b *testing.B) {
noop := func(resp *filer_pb.SubscribeMetadataResponse) error { return nil }
p := NewMetadataProcessor(noop, numJobs+1, 0)
// Fill with active jobs in different directories
for i := range numJobs {
dir := fmt.Sprintf("/dir%d/sub%d", i/100, i%100)
name := fmt.Sprintf("file%d.txt", i)
resp := makeResp(dir, name, false, int64(i+1), true)
path, newPath, kind := extractJobInfo(resp)
p.activeJobs[resp.TsNs] = &syncJobPaths{path: path, newPath: newPath, kind: kind}
p.addPathToIndex(path, kind)
}
// Benchmark conflict check for a non-conflicting event
probe := makeResp("/other/path", "test.txt", false, int64(numJobs+1), true)
var r bool
b.ResetTimer()
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
r = p.conflictsWith(probe)
}
benchResult = r
})
}
}