mirror of
https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs.git
synced 2026-10-13 09:38:36 +02:00
test/fuse_dlm, test/fuse_p2p/peer_chunk_sharing_test.go and unmaintained/check_disk_size use syscall.Flock, syscall.Stat_t and syscall.Statfs, which do not exist on Windows. Without constraints, gopls and go vet on a Windows host report them as undefined. fuse_p2p/framework_test.go already carries `linux || darwin`; the FUSE test files now match it. check_disk_size uses the same constraint as weed/stats/disk_supported.go. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
280 lines
8.8 KiB
Go
280 lines
8.8 KiB
Go
//go:build linux || darwin
|
|
|
|
package fuse_dlm
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
"os"
|
|
"path/filepath"
|
|
"sync"
|
|
"sync/atomic"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// TestDLMConcurrentWritersSameFile verifies that two mounts writing to the same
|
|
// file concurrently produce valid (non-corrupted) data. With DLM enabled, the
|
|
// writes are serialized — one blocks until the other completes.
|
|
//
|
|
// Note: cross-mount read consistency depends on FUSE kernel cache invalidation
|
|
// and filer metadata subscription, which are asynchronous. This test verifies
|
|
// write integrity, not instant read convergence.
|
|
func TestDLMConcurrentWritersSameFile(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if testing.Short() {
|
|
t.Skip("skipping DLM integration test in short mode")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
cluster := startDLMTestCluster(t)
|
|
t.Cleanup(cluster.Stop)
|
|
|
|
const iterations = 5
|
|
for iter := 0; iter < iterations; iter++ {
|
|
fileName := fmt.Sprintf("concurrent_write_%d.txt", iter)
|
|
payloadA := []byte(fmt.Sprintf("mount0-iteration-%d-payload-AAAA", iter))
|
|
payloadB := []byte(fmt.Sprintf("mount1-iteration-%d-payload-BBBB", iter))
|
|
|
|
var wg sync.WaitGroup
|
|
wg.Add(2)
|
|
|
|
go func() {
|
|
defer wg.Done()
|
|
err := os.WriteFile(filepath.Join(cluster.mountPoints[0], fileName), payloadA, 0644)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err, "mount0 write iteration %d", iter)
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
go func() {
|
|
defer wg.Done()
|
|
err := os.WriteFile(filepath.Join(cluster.mountPoints[1], fileName), payloadB, 0644)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err, "mount1 write iteration %d", iter)
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
wg.Wait()
|
|
|
|
// Verify file is readable and contains one of the expected payloads
|
|
// (read from mount0 — its own view is authoritative for write success).
|
|
content, err := os.ReadFile(filepath.Join(cluster.mountPoints[0], fileName))
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "read from mount0 iteration %d", iter)
|
|
validPayload := string(content) == string(payloadA) || string(content) == string(payloadB)
|
|
assert.True(t, validPayload,
|
|
"iteration %d: content must be one of the expected payloads, got: %q", iter, content)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestDLMRepeatedOpenWriteClose verifies that repeated open/write/close cycles
|
|
// from both mounts all succeed without errors.
|
|
func TestDLMRepeatedOpenWriteClose(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if testing.Short() {
|
|
t.Skip("skipping DLM integration test in short mode")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
cluster := startDLMTestCluster(t)
|
|
t.Cleanup(cluster.Stop)
|
|
|
|
const cycles = 20
|
|
fileName := "repeated_write.txt"
|
|
|
|
var wg sync.WaitGroup
|
|
wg.Add(2)
|
|
|
|
go func() {
|
|
defer wg.Done()
|
|
for i := 0; i < cycles; i++ {
|
|
data := []byte(fmt.Sprintf("mount0-cycle-%d", i))
|
|
err := os.WriteFile(filepath.Join(cluster.mountPoints[0], fileName), data, 0644)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err, "mount0 cycle %d", i)
|
|
}
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
go func() {
|
|
defer wg.Done()
|
|
for i := 0; i < cycles; i++ {
|
|
data := []byte(fmt.Sprintf("mount1-cycle-%d", i))
|
|
err := os.WriteFile(filepath.Join(cluster.mountPoints[1], fileName), data, 0644)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err, "mount1 cycle %d", i)
|
|
}
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
wg.Wait()
|
|
|
|
// File must be readable from at least one mount
|
|
content, err := os.ReadFile(filepath.Join(cluster.mountPoints[0], fileName))
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
assert.NotEmpty(t, content, "file must not be empty")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestDLMWriteBlocksSecondWriter verifies the core DLM guarantee: while one
|
|
// mount has a file open for writing, another mount's write-open blocks until
|
|
// the first mount closes the file.
|
|
func TestDLMWriteBlocksSecondWriter(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if testing.Short() {
|
|
t.Skip("skipping DLM integration test in short mode")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
cluster := startDLMTestCluster(t)
|
|
t.Cleanup(cluster.Stop)
|
|
|
|
fileName := "blocking_test.txt"
|
|
path0 := filepath.Join(cluster.mountPoints[0], fileName)
|
|
path1 := filepath.Join(cluster.mountPoints[1], fileName)
|
|
|
|
// Mount 0 opens the file for writing and holds it open
|
|
f, err := os.OpenFile(path0, os.O_CREATE|os.O_WRONLY|os.O_TRUNC, 0644)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "mount0 open")
|
|
_, err = f.Write([]byte("mount0-holds-lock"))
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "mount0 write")
|
|
|
|
// Mount 1 tries to write — should block (we use a goroutine with atomic flag)
|
|
var mount1Completed atomic.Bool
|
|
mount1Done := make(chan error, 1)
|
|
go func() {
|
|
err := os.WriteFile(path1, []byte("mount1-waited"), 0644)
|
|
mount1Completed.Store(true)
|
|
mount1Done <- err
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
// Give mount 1 a moment — it should NOT complete while mount 0 holds the file open
|
|
time.Sleep(3 * time.Second)
|
|
require.False(t, mount1Completed.Load(),
|
|
"mount1 write must not complete while mount0 holds the file open")
|
|
t.Log("mount1 write is blocked as expected while mount0 holds the file")
|
|
|
|
// Mount 0 closes the file — this releases the DLM lock
|
|
require.NoError(t, f.Close(), "mount0 close")
|
|
|
|
// Mount 1 should now complete
|
|
select {
|
|
case err := <-mount1Done:
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err, "mount1 write after mount0 close")
|
|
case <-time.After(30 * time.Second):
|
|
t.Fatal("mount1 write did not complete within 30s after mount0 closed")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestDLMRenameWhileWriteOpen verifies that a rename is coordinated with DLM:
|
|
// while mount0 has a file open for writing (re-opened after creation),
|
|
// mount1 cannot rename it until mount0 closes the file.
|
|
func TestDLMRenameWhileWriteOpen(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if testing.Short() {
|
|
t.Skip("skipping DLM integration test in short mode")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
cluster := startDLMTestCluster(t)
|
|
t.Cleanup(cluster.Stop)
|
|
|
|
origName := "rename_source.txt"
|
|
newName := "rename_dest.txt"
|
|
|
|
// Create and close the file first so it's flushed to the filer and
|
|
// visible on both mounts.
|
|
require.NoError(t, os.WriteFile(
|
|
filepath.Join(cluster.mountPoints[0], origName),
|
|
[]byte("initial-content"), 0644))
|
|
time.Sleep(2 * time.Second) // metadata propagation
|
|
|
|
// Verify mount1 can see the file
|
|
_, err := os.Stat(filepath.Join(cluster.mountPoints[1], origName))
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "mount1 should see the file")
|
|
|
|
// Mount 0 re-opens the file for writing and holds it open
|
|
f, err := os.OpenFile(
|
|
filepath.Join(cluster.mountPoints[0], origName),
|
|
os.O_WRONLY|os.O_TRUNC, 0644)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "mount0 reopen")
|
|
_, err = f.Write([]byte("data-while-holding-lock"))
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "mount0 write")
|
|
|
|
// Mount 1 tries to rename — should block because mount0 holds the
|
|
// DLM lock on the old path
|
|
var renameCompleted atomic.Bool
|
|
renameDone := make(chan error, 1)
|
|
go func() {
|
|
err := os.Rename(
|
|
filepath.Join(cluster.mountPoints[1], origName),
|
|
filepath.Join(cluster.mountPoints[1], newName))
|
|
renameCompleted.Store(true)
|
|
renameDone <- err
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
// Rename must NOT complete while mount0 holds the file open
|
|
time.Sleep(3 * time.Second)
|
|
require.False(t, renameCompleted.Load(),
|
|
"rename must not complete while mount0 holds the file open")
|
|
t.Log("rename is blocked as expected while mount0 holds the file")
|
|
|
|
// Mount 0 closes → releases DLM lock → rename should proceed
|
|
require.NoError(t, f.Close(), "mount0 close")
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case err := <-renameDone:
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err, "rename after mount0 close")
|
|
case <-time.After(30 * time.Second):
|
|
t.Fatal("rename did not complete within 30s after mount0 closed")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Note: Same-mount rename while a file is open for writing is not tested here
|
|
// because macOS FUSE serializes operations on the same inode, causing a
|
|
// kernel-level deadlock between the Rename handler's internal flush and the
|
|
// pending Close. Same-mount coordination is already handled by the per-mount
|
|
// fhLockTable and FUSE kernel serialization, so DLM is not needed for it.
|
|
|
|
// TestDLMConcurrentRenames verifies that two concurrent renames of the same
|
|
// file from different mounts don't corrupt metadata. DLM locks on both old
|
|
// and new paths ensure renames are serialized.
|
|
func TestDLMConcurrentRenames(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if testing.Short() {
|
|
t.Skip("skipping DLM integration test in short mode")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
cluster := startDLMTestCluster(t)
|
|
t.Cleanup(cluster.Stop)
|
|
|
|
// Create a file first
|
|
origPath := filepath.Join(cluster.mountPoints[0], "rename_race.txt")
|
|
require.NoError(t, os.WriteFile(origPath, []byte("original-content"), 0644))
|
|
time.Sleep(1 * time.Second) // propagation
|
|
|
|
// Both mounts try to rename the same file concurrently
|
|
var wg sync.WaitGroup
|
|
var errA, errB error
|
|
wg.Add(2)
|
|
|
|
go func() {
|
|
defer wg.Done()
|
|
errA = os.Rename(
|
|
filepath.Join(cluster.mountPoints[0], "rename_race.txt"),
|
|
filepath.Join(cluster.mountPoints[0], "renamed_by_mount0.txt"),
|
|
)
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
go func() {
|
|
defer wg.Done()
|
|
errB = os.Rename(
|
|
filepath.Join(cluster.mountPoints[1], "rename_race.txt"),
|
|
filepath.Join(cluster.mountPoints[1], "renamed_by_mount1.txt"),
|
|
)
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
wg.Wait()
|
|
|
|
// At least one rename should succeed; the other may fail with ENOENT
|
|
// since the source was already moved.
|
|
succeeded := 0
|
|
if errA == nil {
|
|
succeeded++
|
|
t.Logf("mount0 rename succeeded")
|
|
} else {
|
|
t.Logf("mount0 rename failed: %v", errA)
|
|
}
|
|
if errB == nil {
|
|
succeeded++
|
|
t.Logf("mount1 rename succeeded")
|
|
} else {
|
|
t.Logf("mount1 rename failed: %v", errB)
|
|
}
|
|
assert.GreaterOrEqual(t, succeeded, 1, "at least one rename must succeed")
|
|
}
|