mirror of
https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs.git
synced 2026-09-12 09:30:46 +02:00
Marp-based markdown deck walking through the three-layer production topology (masters, volumes, filers + DB, S3 gateways, admin + workers) plus an erasure-coding note. Uses the object-store-layout diagram on the overview slide. Makefile renders PDF/HTML/PPTX via marp-cli.
3.4 KiB
3.4 KiB
marp, theme, paginate
| marp | theme | paginate |
|---|---|---|
| true | default | true |
SeaweedFS Production Setup
A walkthrough of the recommended deployment topology
- Storage layer
- File access layer
- Backend operations
- Erasure coding for durability
Storage Layer
3 Masters + Volume Servers
-
Masters (run 3)
- Form a Raft quorum; tolerate 1 failure
- Track volume locations and cluster topology
- Lightweight; not on the data path for reads/writes after lookup
-
Volume Servers (scale out)
- Hold the actual needle data on local disks
- Add more servers for capacity and throughput
- Heartbeat to masters; clients talk to them directly for I/O
Rule of thumb: start with 3 masters, then grow volume servers with data.
File Access Layer
Filer + DB for metadata
- Filer serves POSIX-like directory and file metadata
- Metadata store options: PostgreSQL, MySQL, Redis, Cassandra, TiKV, etc.
- Run 3 filers for HA
- Filers are stateless relative to each other — state lives in the DB
S3 Servers
- Expose the S3 API on top of the filer
- Scale the count based on throughput requirements
- Can be co-located with filers or run independently
Backend Operations
1 Admin Server + a few Workers
-
Admin server (1 is enough)
- Coordinates background jobs: balancing, EC encoding, vacuum, replication fixes
- Not on the data path — a restart does not affect object store reads/writes
- No HA required for normal operation
-
Workers (a few)
- Execute long-running tasks issued by the admin server
- Horizontally scalable based on maintenance workload
Keeps housekeeping off the hot path.
Production Topology Summary
| Component | Count | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Master | 3 | Raft quorum, topology, volume map |
| Volume Server | N (scale out) | Stores data needles |
| Filer | 3 | Metadata gateway |
| Metadata DB | HA cluster | Persists filer metadata |
| S3 Server | N (by throughput) | S3 API frontend |
| Admin | 1 | Background job coordinator |
| Worker | A few | Executes admin-scheduled tasks |
Erasure Coding for Durability
Prefer many volume servers so EC shards spread across failure domains.
Example: 8 volume servers, EC 5+3
- Each volume becomes 5 data shards + 3 parity shards
- Shards are placed on 8 distinct volume servers
- Tolerates up to 3 simultaneous volume server failures
- Storage overhead: 1.6x vs 3x for full replication
Volume -> [D1][D2][D3][D4][D5] + [P1][P2][P3]
| | | | | | | |
VS1 VS2 VS3 VS4 VS5 VS6 VS7 VS8
More volume servers = more EC layouts available (e.g. 10+4, 6+3).
Getting Started Checklist
- Provision 3 master nodes (small boxes are fine)
- Provision volume servers sized to your data footprint
- Stand up an HA metadata DB, then 3 filers pointing at it
- Add S3 servers sized to required throughput
- Run 1 admin + a few workers for background maintenance
- Once you have enough volume servers, enable EC (e.g. 5+3 on 8 servers)
Scale each layer independently as usage grows.
