mirror of
https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs.git
synced 2026-09-13 01:50:40 +02:00
* filer: session lease + reaping for POSIX locks A mount renews its session lease by keepalive (new KEEP_ALIVE op); the owner filer records last-seen per session and a background sweeper reaps the locks of leased sessions that stop renewing — a dead or partitioned mount. Only sessions that have renewed are leased, so this is inert until mounts run with -posixLock. * mount: route POSIX advisory locks to the owner filer (-posixLock) (#9665) mount: route POSIX advisory locks to the owner filer under -dlm With -dlm, GetLk/SetLk/SetLkw and the flush/release cleanup paths go to the inode's owner filer via the PosixLock RPC instead of the local table, so flock/fcntl are honored across mounts. Advisory locking rides the same switch as whole-file write coordination — and is therefore off under writeback cache, which implies single-writer. The mount calls its filer and relies on filer-side forwarding to reach the owner. Keys are the inode identity (HardLinkId else path); SetLkw is client-side polling with the FUSE cancel channel (no server wait queue); a per-mount session id namespaces owners; a local hint avoids a release RPC on every close. * mount,filer: bound posix-lock release RPCs and stop the reaper on shutdown The unlock/release RPCs run off the syscall path (close/flush) and used context.Background() with no deadline, so a slow or unreachable filer could hang close() indefinitely; bound them to 5s (they still aren't cancelled by an interrupt). The lease-reaping sweeper now selects on a stop channel that FilerServer.Shutdown closes, instead of looping for the process lifetime.
195 lines
6.1 KiB
Go
195 lines
6.1 KiB
Go
package posixlock
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"math"
|
|
"runtime"
|
|
"sync"
|
|
"sync/atomic"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
"time"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func TestManagerGrantAndConflict(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m := NewManager()
|
|
if _, granted := m.TryLock("a", Range{Start: 0, End: 99, Type: Write, Sid: 1, Owner: 1}); !granted {
|
|
t.Fatal("first lock should be granted")
|
|
}
|
|
if c, granted := m.TryLock("a", Range{Start: 50, End: 149, Type: Write, Sid: 2, Owner: 1}); granted {
|
|
t.Fatalf("overlapping lock from another session should conflict, got grant; conflict=%+v", c)
|
|
}
|
|
// A different key is independent.
|
|
if _, granted := m.TryLock("b", Range{Start: 0, End: 99, Type: Write, Sid: 2, Owner: 1}); !granted {
|
|
t.Fatal("lock on a different key should be granted")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestManagerUnlockCleansEmptyKeyAndIndex(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m := NewManager()
|
|
lk := Range{Start: 0, End: 99, Type: Write, Sid: 1, Owner: 1}
|
|
m.TryLock("a", lk)
|
|
|
|
if !m.bySid[1]["a"] {
|
|
t.Fatal("session index should record the held key")
|
|
}
|
|
m.Unlock("a", Range{Start: 0, End: 99, Type: Unlock, Sid: 1, Owner: 1})
|
|
|
|
if _, ok := m.byKey["a"]; ok {
|
|
t.Fatal("empty set should be dropped from byKey")
|
|
}
|
|
if _, ok := m.bySid[1]; ok {
|
|
t.Fatal("session index should be pruned when it holds nothing")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestManagerPartialUnlockKeepsIndex(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m := NewManager()
|
|
m.TryLock("a", Range{Start: 0, End: 49, Type: Write, Sid: 1, Owner: 1})
|
|
m.TryLock("a", Range{Start: 100, End: 149, Type: Write, Sid: 1, Owner: 1})
|
|
// Release one of the two ranges; the session still holds the other.
|
|
m.Unlock("a", Range{Start: 0, End: 49, Type: Unlock, Sid: 1, Owner: 1})
|
|
|
|
if !m.bySid[1]["a"] {
|
|
t.Fatal("session still holds a lock on the key; index must remain")
|
|
}
|
|
if _, ok := m.byKey["a"]; !ok {
|
|
t.Fatal("key should remain while a lock is held")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestManagerGetLk(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m := NewManager()
|
|
m.TryLock("a", Range{Start: 10, End: 50, Type: Write, Sid: 1, Owner: 1, Pid: 7})
|
|
c, found := m.GetLk("a", Range{Start: 30, End: 70, Type: Read, Sid: 2, Owner: 1})
|
|
if !found || c.Pid != 7 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected conflict from pid 7, got %+v found=%v", c, found)
|
|
}
|
|
if _, found := m.GetLk("missing", Range{Start: 0, End: 1, Type: Write, Sid: 9, Owner: 9}); found {
|
|
t.Fatal("missing key should report no conflict")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestManagerReleasePosixOwnerKeepsFlockAndIndex(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m := NewManager()
|
|
m.TryLock("a", Range{Start: 0, End: 99, Type: Write, Sid: 1, Owner: 1})
|
|
m.TryLock("a", Range{Start: 0, End: math.MaxUint64, Type: Write, Sid: 1, Owner: 1, IsFlock: true})
|
|
|
|
m.ReleasePosixOwner("a", 1, 1)
|
|
|
|
// flock lock for the same session remains, so the index must remain too.
|
|
if !m.bySid[1]["a"] {
|
|
t.Fatal("session still holds the flock lock; index must remain")
|
|
}
|
|
if _, found := m.GetLk("a", Range{Start: 0, End: 10, Type: Write, Sid: 2, Owner: 2, IsFlock: true}); !found {
|
|
t.Fatal("flock lock should survive ReleasePosixOwner")
|
|
}
|
|
if _, found := m.GetLk("a", Range{Start: 0, End: 10, Type: Write, Sid: 2, Owner: 2}); found {
|
|
t.Fatal("fcntl lock should be gone after ReleasePosixOwner")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestManagerReleaseSessionReapsAcrossKeys(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m := NewManager()
|
|
m.TryLock("a", Range{Start: 0, End: 99, Type: Write, Sid: 1, Owner: 1})
|
|
m.TryLock("b", Range{Start: 0, End: 99, Type: Write, Sid: 1, Owner: 2})
|
|
m.TryLock("b", Range{Start: 200, End: 299, Type: Write, Sid: 2, Owner: 1})
|
|
|
|
m.ReleaseSession(1)
|
|
|
|
if _, ok := m.bySid[1]; ok {
|
|
t.Fatal("reaped session should be gone from the index")
|
|
}
|
|
if _, ok := m.byKey["a"]; ok {
|
|
t.Fatal("key a held only session 1's lock and should be dropped")
|
|
}
|
|
// Session 2's lock on b survives.
|
|
if _, found := m.GetLk("b", Range{Start: 200, End: 299, Type: Write, Sid: 9, Owner: 9}); !found {
|
|
t.Fatal("session 2's lock on b should remain after reaping session 1")
|
|
}
|
|
if !m.bySid[2]["b"] {
|
|
t.Fatal("session 2 index entry should remain")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestManagerReapsOnlyStaleLeasedSessions(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m := NewManager()
|
|
// Session 1: holds a lock, leased but stale (renewed long ago).
|
|
m.TryLock("a", Range{Start: 0, End: 99, Type: Write, Sid: 1, Owner: 1})
|
|
m.Renew(1)
|
|
m.lastSeen[1] = time.Now().Add(-time.Hour)
|
|
// Session 2: holds a lock, leased and fresh.
|
|
m.TryLock("b", Range{Start: 0, End: 99, Type: Write, Sid: 2, Owner: 1})
|
|
m.Renew(2)
|
|
// Session 3: holds a lock but never renewed (no lease) — must not be reaped.
|
|
m.TryLock("c", Range{Start: 0, End: 99, Type: Write, Sid: 3, Owner: 1})
|
|
|
|
reaped := m.ReapExpired(30 * time.Second)
|
|
|
|
if len(reaped) != 1 || reaped[0] != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("only the stale leased session should be reaped, got %v", reaped)
|
|
}
|
|
if _, ok := m.byKey["a"]; ok {
|
|
t.Fatal("stale session's lock should be gone")
|
|
}
|
|
if _, ok := m.byKey["b"]; !ok {
|
|
t.Fatal("fresh session's lock must remain")
|
|
}
|
|
if _, ok := m.byKey["c"]; !ok {
|
|
t.Fatal("never-renewed session must not be reaped")
|
|
}
|
|
if _, ok := m.lastSeen[1]; ok {
|
|
t.Fatal("reaped session's lease entry should be cleared")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Mutual exclusion under concurrent whole-file flock churn through the Manager:
|
|
// at most one owner may believe it holds the exclusive lock at any instant.
|
|
func TestManagerConcurrentFlockMutualExclusion(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m := NewManager()
|
|
const (
|
|
key = "inode"
|
|
workers = 16
|
|
iters = 400
|
|
)
|
|
var (
|
|
wg sync.WaitGroup
|
|
holder atomic.Int64
|
|
overlap atomic.Int32
|
|
)
|
|
for w := 0; w < workers; w++ {
|
|
wg.Add(1)
|
|
go func(id int) {
|
|
defer wg.Done()
|
|
lk := Range{Start: 0, End: math.MaxUint64, Type: Write, Sid: uint64(id + 1), Owner: 1, IsFlock: true}
|
|
unlock := lk
|
|
unlock.Type = Unlock
|
|
token := int64(id + 1)
|
|
for i := 0; i < iters; i++ {
|
|
for {
|
|
if _, granted := m.TryLock(key, lk); granted {
|
|
break
|
|
}
|
|
runtime.Gosched()
|
|
}
|
|
if prev := holder.Swap(token); prev != 0 {
|
|
overlap.Add(1)
|
|
}
|
|
runtime.Gosched()
|
|
if !holder.CompareAndSwap(token, 0) {
|
|
overlap.Add(1)
|
|
}
|
|
m.Unlock(key, unlock)
|
|
}
|
|
}(w)
|
|
}
|
|
wg.Wait()
|
|
if n := overlap.Load(); n != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("mutual exclusion violated %d times", n)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(m.byKey) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("all locks released; byKey should be empty, got %d", len(m.byKey))
|
|
}
|
|
if len(m.bySid) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("all locks released; bySid should be empty, got %d", len(m.bySid))
|
|
}
|
|
}
|