From 7b622aef709f9cd965d7f177725918cf694099c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Lu Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 15:50:39 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Updated Filer Benchmark (markdown) --- Filer-Benchmark.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Filer-Benchmark.md b/Filer-Benchmark.md index 17f16b8..1a672a8 100644 --- a/Filer-Benchmark.md +++ b/Filer-Benchmark.md @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ The databases usually is much more expensive than SeaweedFS for the same capacit SeaweedFS has no additional costs for API access, as long as you setup the SeaweedFS cluster. For example, it is a fixed monthly cost if running on EC2 instances. You do not need to worry about unmanageable API costs. -And SeaweedFS can offload less-accessed data to S3 with [[Cloud Tier]], so it literally has unlimited storages. +And SeaweedFS can offload less-accessed data to S3 with [[Cloud Tier]], so it literally has unlimited storage space. ### SeaweedFS on YCSB