SeaweedFS: S3 gateway on the compose network only

PocketBase reaches the gateway over the compose network (or inside the
AIO container), so publishing 8333 on the host only made a second
SeaweedFS stack fail with "port is already allocated". Drop the binding
and SEAWEED_S3_BIND/SEAWEED_S3_PORT.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
tajniak81andClaude Opus 5.5 committed 2026-11-01 18:07:08 +01:00
1 parent 8849fcfb40
commit 0ea562a80a
17 files changed
+33 -83

No files matched your search

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ name: drivervault
# filename overlap). So the two files are interchangeable on the same SEAWEED_DATA,
# with no migration either way. A *second* volume server would need its own.
#
# Only the S3 gateway and the admin UI publish a host port. Master, volume and
# Only the admin UI publishes a host port. The S3 gateway, master, volume and
# filer are reachable over the compose network, through the admin UI, or with
# `docker compose exec` — the volume server in particular serves file content by
# id with no authentication at all, so it has no business on a public interface.
@@ -187,11 +187,7 @@ services:
# Never serve before an identity exists — see seaweedfs-init above.
seaweedfs-init:
condition: service_completed_successfully
ports:
# Loopback only: the stack reaches the gateway over the compose network,
# so this is here for `aws s3 ls --endpoint-url http://127.0.0.1:8333` and
# nothing else. Set SEAWEED_S3_BIND=0.0.0.0 to expose it, and mean it.
- "${SEAWEED_S3_BIND:-127.0.0.1}:${SEAWEED_S3_PORT:-8333}:8333"
# No published port: the stack reaches the gateway over the compose network.
healthcheck:
test: ["CMD-SHELL", "wget -qO- http://127.0.0.1:8333/healthz || exit 1"]
interval: 10s