The add and remove buttons, and the read that checks them
Anker documents neither rfid write, so the bodies are inferred from the field names get_device_cards answers with, and every write re-reads the list: what the card shows is what the account holds, never what an undocumented endpoint claimed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5
parent
a5842201c0
commit
245870a96a
@@ -335,6 +335,22 @@ export const api = {
|
||||
getAnkerChargerDetails: (sn) =>
|
||||
request(`/integrations/anker-solix/chargers/${encodeURIComponent(sn)}/details`),
|
||||
|
||||
// The RFID cards on one charger — the only calls in this client that change
|
||||
// anything on the Anker account. Anker documents neither endpoint, so the
|
||||
// server infers the request and then reads the list back: both of these answer
|
||||
// with {present, cards}, and it is the list that says what happened, not the
|
||||
// status code.
|
||||
saveAnkerRfidCard: (sn, cardNumber, cardName) =>
|
||||
request(`/integrations/anker-solix/chargers/${encodeURIComponent(sn)}/rfid-cards`, {
|
||||
method: "POST",
|
||||
body: JSON.stringify({ cardNumber, cardName }),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
deleteAnkerRfidCard: (sn, cardNumber) =>
|
||||
request(
|
||||
`/integrations/anker-solix/chargers/${encodeURIComponent(sn)}/rfid-cards/${encodeURIComponent(cardNumber)}`,
|
||||
{ method: "DELETE" }
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
||||
// Anker Solix control (per charger), over whichever transport the user's
|
||||
// control mode selects. getAnkerControl returns the control mode, connection
|
||||
// status, and a live status snapshot — an OCPP session snapshot in own/proxy
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user