The charger's own card list gets a door, and says where it differs
0104 was already implemented and already in the action catalogue; nothing routed to it, so the only way to see the device's list was as a side effect of writing a card. It has an endpoint now, and the panel a button. The two lists are compared where they meet: a card the charger holds and the account has forgotten still opens it, and a card only the account holds will not, and neither shows anywhere else. The comparison is drawn only when they disagree, and the device's reading is dropped on a refresh rather than measured against an account list from a later moment. The new test asks all four card routes without a token: a capability the plugin implements and the catalogue advertises is still unusable if nothing routes to it, and no other test here would notice. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5
parent
7176867eb3
commit
3064bff8ad
@@ -357,6 +357,12 @@ export const api = {
|
||||
`/integrations/anker-solix/chargers/${encodeURIComponent(sn)}/rfid-cards/${encodeURIComponent(cardNumber)}`,
|
||||
{ method: "DELETE" }
|
||||
),
|
||||
// The list the charger itself holds, asked of the device rather than of the
|
||||
// account. Both are written by every add and remove, and they can still come
|
||||
// apart; this is the only call that says so. Answers with {cards} — bare
|
||||
// numbers, because the device has no field for a card's name.
|
||||
getAnkerChargerCards: (sn) =>
|
||||
request(`/integrations/anker-solix/chargers/${encodeURIComponent(sn)}/rfid-cards/charger`),
|
||||
|
||||
// Anker Solix control (per charger), over whichever transport the user's
|
||||
// control mode selects. getAnkerControl returns the control mode, connection
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user