Files
seaweedfs/test/s3tables/catalog_lancedb
Chris Lu 49a7d4ff6a test: pin the LanceDB client, and index before searching
Three from review.

The client's dependencies were unpinned, so an unrelated upstream release
could change what an old commit reproduces. Pinned to the versions this
suite was verified against; the client is as much the thing under test as
the server.

The search was called ANN and was not: without an index LanceDB scans.
The test now builds an IVF_PQ index over 1024 rows first, which is worth
more than the wording fix - an index writes into a directory of the table
that the S3 door has to admit, and that guard has refused a Lance
directory before. It builds, covers all 1024 rows, and searches.

The assertion moved with it. Demanding the exact nearest neighbour was
right for a brute-force scan and wrong for a quantized index, which
answered 0 as readily as 1; both are correct, so the check is now the
neighbourhood.

And the pushdown check accepted any failure. It now requires the refusal
to be the catalog's Unsupported and requires that nothing was left behind,
or, when the client falls back, that the table is complete.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Rkp1Mw5E89Jp6dzJFYiMrm
2026-08-20 19:51:55 -07:00
..

LanceDB Integration Test

Drives the SeaweedFS Lance Namespace with LanceDB, the way catalog_spark, catalog_trino and catalog_clickhouse drive the Iceberg REST catalog with their engines.

Why a real client

Every serious bug in this catalog so far looked correct to a request written by hand: a deregister that deleted the dataset, an S3 door that refused every Lance file, a namespace that listed tables it would then deny. A hand-built HTTP test checks the shape of a response. A client checks whether the response is usable — that the location it hands back, the storage options beside it and the layout rules on the S3 door all line up at once.

LanceDB connects with connect_namespace("rest", ...), which speaks the routes this catalog implements, so what runs here is the protocol rather than our own idea of it.

What it does

TestLanceDBNamespace:

  1. Starts a weed mini cluster with S3 and the Lance Namespace enabled.
  2. Creates a table bucket declared LANCE, so the catalog refuses tables of any other format in it.
  3. Builds Dockerfile.client (LanceDB, pylance, lance-namespace) and runs lancedb_ops.py against the namespace.

Inside the container:

Step What it proves
seed a table the namespace's location and credentials are enough to write
table_names the catalog is browsable through LanceDB
open_table LanceDB resolves a table through the catalog and reads it
schema check the vector column survived the round trip
create_index an IVF_PQ index builds, and its files land through the S3 door's layout rules
search(...) approximate search over that index, on data behind SeaweedFS
where("id < 5") so does the scan path, not only the index
create_table LanceDB declares through the namespace and writes the data itself
create_table with pushdown either the client falls back and the table is complete, or the catalog refuses with the spec's Unsupported and leaves nothing behind
direct lance.dataset(uri) the catalog stays optional; the dataset opens without it

The seeding is pylance rather than LanceDB, because the namespace records where a table lives and does not carry its data. That split is the design, not a limitation of the test.

Running it

cd test/s3tables/catalog_lancedb
(cd ../../../weed && go build .)     # the harness runs this binary
go test -run TestLanceDBNamespace -v -timeout 30m .

Skipped without Docker, and in -short mode. The first run builds the client image, which takes a few minutes; later runs reuse it.