2b4f4f034da79ff9a476ba0cd78499d0a7ea3dc4
5
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 tajniak81andClaude Opus 5
|
1a7f04cba0 |
A dash printed above the value it was missing
The Charger information card read "—" beside State and OCPP status while the raw
block three rows below it printed chargerStatus 1 and ocpp_connect_status 2. The
account had answered both. The merge asked for the state as evChargerStatus,
operating_state or status, which is how the standalone and station views spell
it, and the bound-device view — the one this account actually answers from —
spells it chargerStatus. The OCPP state it never asked that view for at all. All
three views now read through one fillDevice, which tries every spelling a view is
known to use, so a value any of them sends reaches the row that was drawing a
dash for want of it.
The same views were carrying the whole box-on-the-wall half unread: the Wi-Fi
network and its MAC, the signal strength, the Bluetooth MAC, the time zone, when
the account bound the charger, how the app can reach it — BLE, Wi-Fi — and the
product shot for the model, which now sits beside the charger's name in both
apps. Named rows, in three languages, the way the register map's readings are
named.
One field wanted the opposite treatment. The device record carries blue_password,
the charger's own Bluetooth pairing password, and the card was printing it in
clear into every screenshot anyone takes of that page. Any leaf key holding a
password, secret, token, private key or certificate is now masked in the raw
block: that the field exists is worth reporting, its value is not.
Four endpoints answer only when a serial is named, so none of them could belong
to the list the card is drawn from, and nothing had ever called them. The station
record, the charging totals, the OCPP backend and the RFID cards now arrive
through a charger-details capability behind
GET …/anker-solix/chargers/{sn}/details, asked for the charger being looked at,
best effort, each view reporting its own failure — an account that is not the
owner cannot read the cards, which is a fact about the account rather than an
error in the read.
Those four are shown under the cloud's own keys, and that is not an oversight.
The REST map documents which endpoints exist and what each is for; it does not
document a single one of their payloads. Naming those fields is the next commit,
made from what actually comes back, now that there is somewhere to see it.
Not touched: the endpoints the map marks ready but unwired — session history,
site price, OTA, sharing, notifications — each a feature rather than a row on this
card; and the unmapped ones, which the map warns delete sessions and unbind
devices with payloads nobody has ever seen.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
tajniak81andClaude Opus 5
|
2425a8d3d6 |
A field we have no name for is still a field it sent
Two cards on the Charging page were answering with a fraction of what the charger and the account actually report, and in both the losses happened quietly, in a parse that kept the fields it recognised and dropped the rest on the floor. Charger information asked three account-wide views and kept fourteen fields. A charger registered on its own is absent from the site view, which is the only one of the three carrying state, charge power and OCPP status — so exactly the charger that stands alone got the column of dashes, and nothing said why. The per-charger station record, get_evcharger_station_info, is what the mobile app opens when you tap a charger, and it is the one view that answers for a charger outside a station; it is now the fourth view, asked per charger, a failure there costing that charger's row and no more. Alongside it, every field each of the four views sent is kept as attrs, under the cloud's own key, nested objects joined with a dot and arrays carrying their index. First view to answer a key wins, which is the rule the named fields already merged by. Two hundred keys and two hundred and forty runes per value keep a station record with a session list from becoming the whole card. Charger readings lost data twice over. The frame decoder skipped any field byte its per-message map could not name, and a message type with no map decoded to nothing at all; those fields are now kept under the message and the byte they arrived in — 0410.c9 — decoded but unscaled, because a factor is half of a meaning and we do not have the other half. Then the projection read forty-odd names into typed fields and dropped the remainder: sessionStartedAt, the per-phase session energies, the three touch modes, the load-balance monitor and its meter flag, the solar monitor. Those land in extra, and the list maintains itself — the four accessors note every key they read, extra is what is left, and a field modelled later stops appearing there without anyone remembering to remove it. Keeping unnamed fields had one consequence worth guarding. An unmapped message now decodes to something rather than nothing, and ingest stamped settingsAt for anything that was not telemetry — the timestamp a control command waits on to say the charger acknowledged it. A frame we cannot read is not an acknowledgement, so the stamp is now conditional on the message type being one we map, while its fields are kept either way. Both cards show the remainder as what it is: the service's own key, no unit, no translation, no renaming, under a heading that says whose words these are. The blocks appear only when there is something in them, so a Modbus charger's readings card and a charger the cloud says nothing more about are unchanged. Naming one of these fields is a later commit, made from evidence; inventing a label for it today would only make a guess look settled. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
tajniak81andClaude Opus 5
|
c1aee0fac1 |
One refused sign-in, not five: the chargers poll no longer locks the account
A chargers poll asks four cloud views. Each called apiRequest, each found no token, and each ran its own login — so a login Anker refuses was offered four times in one poll, and the next poll spent the fifth. Five is what disables the account for ten minutes, which is how "code 26161: Failed to request." turned into "your account has been disabled" on the very next attempt. The plugin now remembers a refused login instead of repeating it: the failure is cached and replayed to every caller until a backoff window passes — a minute at first, doubling to fifteen, or the full ten minutes when Anker says it has already locked the account (code 10019). New credentials clear it, so a fixed password is tried at once. chargerInventory signs in once up front. A login the cloud refuses is not four views failing, so it is reported as itself rather than as three warnings with the lockout notice buried in the last one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
tajniak81andClaude Opus 5
|
a809980d8b |
Anker health: count the chargers the panel lists, not the ones one endpoint admits to
The probe still asked get_user_bind_and_not_in_station_evchargers and read its userBindEvChargersCount, so it reported "0 EV charger(s) bound to account" for an account whose two chargers the panel was listing directly underneath — the same blind spot the capability was just moved off, left behind in the health check. It now takes the same inventory the chargers capability returns and counts that. Authenticated with nothing on the account is degraded rather than ok, following Greencell's rule: the half we address answers, and the empty half is the account or the country that picks the regional server, so the message says so instead of reporting a healthy connection to nothing. A count reached with some view missing says how many views stayed silent, because the number is then a floor rather than a total. The web panel colours degraded amber, as it already did for Greencell. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
tajniak81andClaude Opus 5
|
e138fad3f4 |
Anker: every charger on the account, not just the ones outside a station
get_user_bind_and_not_in_station_evchargers is the only list the connector ever asked for, and its name says exactly what it withholds. A charger that belongs to a system is not in it. Its userBindEvChargersCount, though, counts every charger bound to the account — so an owner with two chargers in a system got "authenticated; 2 EV charger(s) bound to account" from the health probe and an empty list from the capability that is supposed to show them. A working login that finds nothing. So the capability now asks every view the cloud has and merges them by serial. The standalone list still answers for chargers standing on their own; get_site_list walks the systems and reads each one through get_scen_info, falling back to get_system_running_info where that is silent — the power-service / HES split charger-state already knows; and get_relate_and_bind_devices contributes model, firmware and the Wi-Fi flag, and discovers anything in the A519 family that the first two missed. Whichever way a charger was registered, one of the three has it. The merge is first-writer-wins per field rather than last view overwriting: the standalone record knows the name, the site record knows the live state, and neither should blank what the other established. A view that fails is a warning on the document instead of an error on the call, because one dead endpoint should not cost the chargers the other two found. Only losing all three is a failure. When nothing comes back at all the response says so in its own words and names the remaining suspect — country picks the regional server, and the wrong one authenticates happily and shows an empty account. The other half of "not showing any chargers" was that neither client ever showed a list. The serial was a text box, and the number is printed on a charger hanging on a wall. Both apps now list what the account holds — name, serial, model, site, state, an offline badge — and hand the serial to the OCPP control card instead of asking anyone to go and read it. Where control is off the list still stands on its own, as the answer to the first question an owner has after entering credentials. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |